Well, it wasn't "shortly", but now it should be fixed.

@bxlforever Please review and express your opinion on moving the tram stop a bit southwest

Hallo Leo,

alleen, dat ik het goed versta: het gaat om de volgoorde van de tram platforms in de twee relaties voor de twee rijrichtingen? Dus had ik met iD in volgoorde van de rijrichting van Tram 3 een tram platform achter elkaar eerin gezet, dan was get geen probleem geweest?

Ik kan echter ook JOSM eens uitprobeeren en kijken, of ik het goed kan zetten, het is natuurlijk niet de bedoeling dat andere achter met op moeten ruimen.

Hi, first of all thanks for staying attentive as to possible mistakes!

I didn't know about the best practise of keeping separate stop relations, I'd assumed that it being an interchange station it would make sense to group them together.

I'll undo this in a moment.

Wrong commit message: this adds switch info east of Cervignano

Oh! Thank you for notifying me, I didn't get an email notification about that. I'll have a look shortly.

It's still existing, I surveyed it just today.

You could of course just have given me a friendly notice of your convention and I would have fixed it myself later but sure, your tone speaks for itself.

Habe Korrekturen vorgenommen, gerne nochmal drüber schauen, falls ich noch was übersehen hab :)

Also adding the tags takes time and being stressed while dealing with Vespucci, quickly adding the info, AND other switches passing by can really be stressful 😀

In some cases I collected the numbers over time, but usually I only manage to decipher one or two switches unless they're numbered logically as in Luxembourg. In Belgium however it's pretty random. Well, yes, of course there is a system but I can't usually predict the number (the A or B is easy).

Haha, very funny! I was in IC 440, now I'm in IC 3217 looking out of the window and trying to recognize the writings on the switches as the train hopefully doesn't drive too fast past them! I tried video recording but it's often too distorted, so it's just my eyes which get worse and worse. Also Infrabel's new switches don't have visible numbers anymore, at least not easily discoverable when passing by.

Danke, schaue ich mir später am PC mal an!

I think the problem there is that iD always shows all existing warnings, not just ones I introduced myself, but let me check back at the next edit.

Oops! Thank you for looking out and fixing it!

Weird, I checked this driver cab video https://youtu.be/3r1YRVn8yfM?si=PNU6FEHJkmq1Yfvo&t=1542 and it seems it has indeed be razed, meaning that northern platform is only accessible from the east.

Thanks for reaching out, that's indeed a mistake. It's just a bit to remember after four months what the current state was when I was there, but I think it's not razed but actually another platform towards Göteborg. I'll check sources the next days.

Hi!
Hab die Mail mit dem Kommentar gefunden, danke für den Hinweis erstmal.

Ich hab zunächst mal Probleme, meinen eigenen Change nachzuvollziehen in der OSM-Oberfläche. Wie hast du dir meinen Change hier angeschaut, via die Weboberfläche (osm.org) und Wege oder eine der beiden XML-Ansichten?

Dann hab ich soweit verstanden: Multipolygone nicht anfassen. Aber den konkreten Unterschied zwischen meiner Version und dem Multipolygon, wie "sehe" ich den am besten?

Danke, ich schau mir das nach meinem Urlaub nächste Woche Mal an! :)

Well, "built over with asphalt" is what I was told by a member of the draisine ride organizers on Saturday as to why we couldn't go any further than the place I marked on the map.

But I just had a second look at street level imagery, it seems it's not asphalt, the rails are just as present as in the middle part, they've just not been cleaned for driving, if you know what I mean. I'll therefore redeclare the entire track as draisine again.