Hi,

I was there on Sunday and the width of the way is quite small. In fact it allows persons on most of the way just to walk one behind the other.

Sorry for that. But it's too long ago to remember what I did. I think I added parts to the trail and didn't connect the two parts.

Remark for the landuse joined to the way:
This was already the case. When you follow down the road to the non changed part you can see that the forest was already linked to the road.
I will correct it.

Hi ma-rt-in

Pappenn ??? Is this something like joining?
I didn't see that in iD, sorry.
What's wrong with the agriculture access?
I don't agree with the bridge! Simple reason is, that the way below a bridge is not a tunnel. Therefore the tunnel needs to be removed.

Just added.

Do you mean that the tag proposed is missing?

Hi ma-rt-in

This area will be a housing area soon. Therefore the road types will be residential.

Hello ma-rt-in

The agriculture use was already listed. I added the limitations. But you are right, it not necessary to list all. I removed the agriculture use (which was anyway not right).

Hi Stereo

I thought I got all the tags, but one fell through the cracks. Thanks for your hint, I corrected it already.

Hi
No, not really. It's quite a time ago that I changed this, but as far as I remember I only moved the line to the correct location. The line (cliff) was already there.
It's a kind of step in a field, maybe with a meter height. Too steep for hiking, biking, etc. over it.

Hello,

sorry for that, my map showed a different layout of CR110. Cancelled changes.