Hey - just checking you used the correct tag here. Permissive suggests the road is open to all traffic and pedestrians until told otherwise. My understanding of the manned gates here is the opposite - closed to general traffic unless you are given permission by the guards to enter (just because the guards don't care and let you in anyway, or that it's just a small barrier and the guards wasn't there at the time, doesn't mean it's permissive - the residential areas here are all gated to prevent general access).

Small amount of abandoned fencing and signage to western edge suggest former use as military or recreational shooting range, but no physical restrictions remain. Area in regular (multiple daily) use by cyclists, off roaders and joggers. Updated to reflect ground truth and not speculative comments based on historical use; referred for review given potential sensitive nature of area.

Yes I think this is better - I thought changing to under construction would affect the bus routes so I moved the position instead. If you can fix it that would be a big help. this footage may help if you need to see the current road locations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cEWbwM2T_8

Yes this one has lots of errors because I moved Đường Nguyễn Khoái on top of Đường Trần Khánh Dư to add the construction area for Cầu Trần Hưng Đạo. Both roads currently run along the same road, however I didn't want to delete both as they have bus route relations I don't know how to recreate properly if the roads were deleted. If you are able to edit the roads correctly and move the bus routes with them, please do so. This was the best I could do to correct the area without deleting lots of bus routes :(

Hey was removal of these gates based on a local survey or aerials? There were manned barriers at these points a few days ago, along with various other points around global gate, but they're barely visible on sat imagery. I'll add them back in if removed in error. Thanks :)

Hey, was this changeset (specifically way/1144267159/history ) based off a recent survey? This road was blocked off by a construction zone as off Feb 2026 so if you simply went off sat imagery it would need reverting.

Được rồi, cảm ơn. Tôi sẽ thêm lại lối đi bộ. Tôi không biết ai đã xóa nó, nhưng nó cần thiết để định tuyến chính xác cho người đi bộ qua cầu, vì đường bộ không định tuyến chính xác cho người đi bộ trong ứng dụng.

ok thanks. I will add the pedestrian path back. i don't know who deleted it, but it is required to correctly route pedestrians across the bridge, as the road does not correctly route foot traffic in the app.

Đường đi bộ trên cầu Long Biên còn mở cửa không? Hình như nó đã bị xóa khỏi bản đồ rồi.
Is the pedestrian walkway still open on cầu Long Biên? It seems to have been deleted from the map.

well... it's deffinately not "residential" either. it;s a mixed-use "urban project" comprising commercial, residential, recreational and utility facilities. The actual residential suburbs have been zoned and named separately. the outer global gate zone was more a placeholder for the overall project. i don't know if there is tag for "urban project" so picked the closest thing that wasn't fully incorrect.

Cảm ơn bạn đã cập nhật thông tin. Liệu các tuyến đường tiếp cận xung quanh Tứ Liên có nên được gắn thẻ là highway=proposed không? Trừ khi công trình đã bắt đầu thi công, trong trường hợp đó chúng ta có thể xóa bỏ bất kỳ tuyến đường nào đã bị phá dỡ trước đây không? Hiện tại rất khó để hiểu tuyến đường nào vẫn còn tồn tại và tuyến đường nào đã bị phá dỡ.

Would the approach roads around Tứ Liên be better tagged as highway=proposed ? Unless construction has physically started, in which case could we remove any previous roads that are demolished> It is currently confusing to understand which roads are still present, and which are not.

No worries - I've fixed a couple in Wagaman and the one I know in Karama. From memory there were quite a few over north Darwin that were perma shut (eg. I think lee point rd > shackle st > maude st might be closed, will check later though). In general any you had to add from scratch are probably not in use as I removed loads last year. In hindsight maybe I should just leave the line there with a note.

Some of these haven't existed for years. Eg. https://www.darwin.nt.gov.au/sites/default/files/old_7_publications_files/poster.pdf

Unless they've all been reopened, many of the cycle/alleyways between streets in north darwin have been shut/sold off/demolished. If you're going simply off aerials for these, they're wrong, and at the very least need access changing and gates adding (I did this for pretty much all of them a year ago; they've all reappeared :( ).

*north west to the valley.

Pretty much all the plots from the north east to the valley are for Quat and Peach blossom trees - in which case shouldn't they all be Plant Nursery with Plant = Trees? Instead or orchard or allotments. Will change myself if no objections.

Ah sorry - I didn't directly change access, only permissions for motorbikes / motorcars / foot which were wrong in places (and corrected an issue with the sidewalk routing), but I think it automatically changed access tags too because of this. I've changed it back now.

Re path - I added it yesterday based on sat image but walked past later and saw it’s private with no access allowed (very clearly signed) so removed it again.

VinHomes Globagate development - it’s a very fast paced dev in Hanoi - I was there 9 months ago and they were still clearing fields. Half of it’s now complete. A lot of the layout is visible in current OSM sat view, some basic layout was added initially by someone else, I’m filling in blanks as much as I can (sat view, some video and promo shots of the area, names of places from construction companies involved). I believe the expo center, parks and some homes are basically done, a lot has been opened temporarily for events then shut again for finishing touches etc, roads are in use but being expanded, etc etc.

The level 2 thing is so constructions I know names of (and likely to take longer tha the rest) display above the residential zones I just added (which hold the correct suburb names, and in turn sit above the overall global gate construction zone). Probs isnt the best way but it’d take forever to intricately zone out everywhere that’s being worked vs places that are done, and by the time I’ve done that they’ve completed something else anyway, so i just left the main construction zone there at default layer so it’s easy to delete once most of the roads and general area is finished and clear of construction crews.

Noticed the changes to Shoal Bay Recycling Centre are inaccurate too - I physically mapped out the trails and borders on foot a year ago and some have now been reverted to incorrect areas. I'll try and put them back from memory as it's only minor stuff.

Re shoal bay I’ll stick this back up to litchfield boundry but not sure this is correct. Micket Creek probably mean north east, and I jogged the boundry last year and the fencing / signage to restrict access to defence land is along the eastern edge (where the area was originally mapped), but that’s not to say they don’t own it up to litchfield.

Thanks. Re. Robertson, the area I’ve put in is the correct area afaik, i last jogged around the area a year ago. Area matches the fenced and signposted area on the ground, and current osm sat images of fencing / boundry roads. Theyve always owned land to right so nothing new if there’s construction there. Only queries i’d have is a) is the transmitter to left of base thier land? It’s fenced off as if it is, but pretty sure it’s not. B) is the kinked road bottom edge of close training area on dod land? I’ve jogged down it and believe the border is/was to the north of that but can check again next year. C) is the firing range north of the marksmanship area part of robbertson or shoal bay land (probably irrelevant but theres no fence dividing it).