Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and making the necessary changes. I really appreciate the feedback shared regarding mapping buildings.
Going ahead, I'll ensure to square the buildings while mapping them.
Thanks again, Looking forward to learn more from you!

Regards,
payelgh

Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset : 109791410 based on Driver feedback.

Regards,
payelgh

Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue.
Going ahead, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors. Thanks again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
payelgh

Hi,
I have changed the small part of the road to track as there are no permanent buildings on either side of that strip and also based on driver feedback which says road is a track road leading into woods.
Kindly, let me know if there are any further concerns or suggestions regarding this edit.

Regards,
payelgh

Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.
Apologies for the incorrect road classification, I will be extra cautious going forward.
Looking forward to learn more from you!
Regards,
payelgh

Hi,

Thank you for providing the information and correcting the edit.
I've edited the suffix of the Road name based on Driver feedback and streetsign imagery available on OSM.
But going forward I'll keep the learning and add suffix as per Tiger data.
Looking forward to learn more from you!

Regards,
payelgh

Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect road classification, I'll make sure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
payelgh

Hi,
Apologies for mistakenly adding a different comment. The correct comment is
added a gate near Upland lane. #Changeset: 90444439
Thanks and Regards,
payelgh

Hi Adamant1,

Thanks for your comment. Apologies for the delay in response. As per your suggestion, I've deleted the entire data in the area and mapped it to the current building under changeset#80849482

Looking forward to learning from you.

Thanks,
Payelgh

Hi,

Thanks for your comment. Apologies for the delay caused in responding. As per your suggestion, I've corrected the edit under changeset# 80849199

Thanks,
payelgh

Hi,

Thanks for your comment. Apologies for the delay caused in responding. As per your suggestion, I've corrected the edit under changeset# 80849199

Thanks,

Hi,

Apologies for the delay caused in responding. I missed to delete the turn restriction while splitting the road, I'll ensure to avoid such errors in my future edits. I see the same has been fixed under Changeset #78872434.

Thanks,
payelgh

Hi MikeN,

Thanks for your update. I have reverted the Restriction – Chageset # - “ 73844746“. I will also pass on this input to my team regarding adding restrictions in South Carolina based on double solid yellow lines. Please let us know any other suggestions you have.

Regards,
payelgh

Hi MikeN,

I added the restriction based on the pair of double solid line which is a legal/painted median. If this is not a valid call, please let us know your suggestion. Eager to learn from you.

Regards,
payelgh

Apologies for using internal terminologies in OSM. I am new to OSM and We have been advised by senior team members to follow OSM standards while commenting. Please find below the comment for the actual edit –Modified Residential Road: India Avenue added directions

Hi,

Thanks for looking into the changeset. Same like the previous changeset (changeset/62231993) Due to some miscommunication I deleted the road segments that were created. Going forward we will make sure that these kind of errors won’t occur.

Regards,
Payelgh

Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit and apologies for the delayed response. I am reverting the changes that were made (adding directions to the whole loop). Thanks for the review again.

Regards,
Payelgh