OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
90435588 about 5 years ago

No problem :-)

84956300 about 5 years ago

This is because I try avoid having multiple 'ways' on top of each other.

This avoids issues in the future with needing to make identical changes to multiple ways.
It also makes logical sense in the boundary for a landuse=meadow is a barrier=fence.

The boundaries of this landuse=meadow are mostly fences, but these are not contiguous.

If a fence is divided into sections, the only way to avoid duplicating sections of a 'way' is via a relation.

I have previously seen places where there was a separate identical 'way' for each of: landuse, protected-area, highway, barrier. This made minor edits very painful.

68117752 almost 7 years ago

Mostly because they often share edges with other features (parks, schools etc), and it is bad practice to have multiple ways covering traversing the same nodes.

Hence, if there is only one way that defines the border between a park and a residential area, then the areas need to be relations...

It makes editing a way quite painful if there are several other ways that cover the same nodes.

59254148 over 7 years ago

Thanks - Probably a mistake - I have fixed some areas of the highway nearby which should have been mapped as divided road. I'll take a look and fix it up.
Cheers, Evan

39783622 over 7 years ago

Hi InputMan,
You may like to comment on the note at this location (note/1362020)
Regards,
Evan

54475548 almost 8 years ago

Hi,
Could you please explain why you reversed the direction of the Hunter and Williams Rivers? The direction of some entities like rivers is important to indicate flow.
I have reverted the directions in changeset: changeset/56399484

Regards,
Evan

55565243 almost 8 years ago

Yep - There's plenty more forest to add around here

28978777 about 8 years ago

Yep - that path is not part of the official trail - see http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/things-to-do/walking-tracks/the-coast-track/map