OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
55019975 almost 8 years ago

Hello Glogi,

in the last year I have tracked and recorded cheb-cycleway [6] in several relations.

The individual sections of the cycleway were each recorded in a relation as „route“.
The entire route of the cycleway was summarized in a relation as „superroute“ (6.889.944).

The naming and description of the whole cycleway and the individual relations was comprehensively carried out in the languages Czech and German.

That was a lot of work, but it brought a good quality result and a great amount of information to users and bicycle-travelers.

https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/?lang=de#route?id=6889944&map=10.396666666666654!50.1969!12.8719

Now I had to realize that most of these relations have been completely deleted, like visible in this changeset.
As reason is only given: “add part of route 6“.

The information collected by me and the good applicability of the individual sections for cyclists have been almost completely lost.

Was this deletion an unintended error?
Could you give an explanation and reasons for deleting the above mentioned relations, and by that destroying a lot of work from another user?

In my eyes and in the adoption of a lot of other users, this is not the way of constructive work in openstreetmap.

The remaining, expanded cycleway Relation 1.187.142 (6) has still much less information content than the deleted relations.

So my aim ist to restore the cycleway in structure and information content, like created before in Relation 6.889.944.

Thank you for your answer

Best regards

Daniel

45964429 almost 9 years ago

Hallo CorrectMapper,
vielen Dank für Deine Korrektur. Der Fehler ist unbeabsichtigt entstanden. Sorry!
Viele Grüße osm_ww

42234305 over 9 years ago

Hallo Andreas,
Danke für die Info. Der Fehler ist mir selbst schon aufgefallen und ich habe die Almhütten jetzt als Schutzhütten ausgewiesen.

Viele Grüße
Daniel