ntzm's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 190664620 | What's the reason for this edit? |
|
| 190757236 | So the building is no longer an active substation? |
|
| 191183173 | Ah nice, I've started adding name:signed=no to paths like this, I think it makes sense! |
|
| 191183173 | Thanks, is the name "Toad Walk" signed here do you know? |
|
| 190169186 | Hi! Can you make sure you add sidewalk:*=separate and ensure you add footway=sidewalk tags e.g. way/1566300091 |
|
| 190778639 | Hey, I'm not sure how StreetComplete works for speed limits, but maxspeed:type=GB:zone20 is only for "20mph zones", not to be confused with sign-only 20mph roads, which should be tagged maxspeed:type=sign. This one is a sign-only so I have fixed the tag https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.367226244444&lng=-1.4711351888889&z=17&pKey=1340132684557190&focus=photo&x=0.9520584938921327&y=0.6300405341019851&zoom=0 |
|
| 174792866 | These shouldn't be tagged as traffic_signals=pedestrian_crossing, as the primary purpose is to control traffic between Granville Square and St Mary's Road. From the wiki:
I have corrected it |
|
| 181784686 | btw, some of these crossings e.g. node/13759642781 are not traffic lighted, the is no option for pedestrians to request a green man to cross. I have corrected them |
|
| 187797935 | I've added the area code, thanks |
|
| 190119049 | Remember to add sidewalk=separate! :) |
|
| 185180900 | Hey, just wanted to mention that the change to East Coast Road was incorrect, the cycleway is on the other side of the road, and is already mapped separately. I have fixed the issues :) |
|
| 186946811 | Hey just to make sure you know, some of these changes were fixed in changeset/188294982 due to a copy+paste error |
|
| 174793323 | You can see the correct layout here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.390520612121&lng=-1.4790724333333&z=17&pKey=1747106783384322&focus=photo&x=0.9715108590913066&y=0.5720517541890838&zoom=0 |
|
| 174793323 | Hi, this change was incorrect. The road was reversed from when Bing took the image. I have reverted it to the correct state. My changeset here changeset/160173056 was tagged as source=survey when it was changed |
|
| 187502659 | Hmm, that's not how I understand it. The wiki states:
Due to the fact that this is not explicitly signed, I would generally be against mapping turn lanes where there is not any explicit signage. |
|
| 187197035 | Hi, in this changeset and this changeset changeset/180516009 there are duplicated ref:GB:uprn tags and seemingly incorrect addr:street tags, I assume from copy-and-pasted houses. Please can you fix when you have the chance! Thank you :) |
|
| 187502659 | missing link: way/4403693 |
|
| 187502659 | Hi, you added turn:lanes to this way but I can't see any turn lanes marked on the road on Mapbox Satellite view: way/96654951 For this way, the left;through|right;through markings on apply part way through the way, near where the service road joins the trunk road. I haven't done much turn lane mapping myself but I just wanted to check that these changes were intentional! Thanks, Nat |
|
| 187634648 | Hi! Welcome to OSM. If you'd like to get more involved with the community in Sheffield, please feel free to join our matrix chat: https://matrix.to/#/#osm-sheffield:matrix.org |
|
| 186577666 | Hey! Welcome to OSM. If you'd like to communicate with the OSM Sheffield community, feel free to join the Matrix chat here https://matrix.to/#/#osm-sheffield:matrix.org |