ngry_pazuzu's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 160191207 | I'll also check for signs the next time I am in the area. The sharrows on Bridge Street eastbound only go up to the crosswalk up under the Lions Gate Bridge. So given the lack of clear signage or road markings from that point onwards and the aggresiveness of drivers there, the general understanding appears to be that portion of roadway isn't designated for cyclists. Almost all cyclists I know (a number of whom average 30+ km/h on flat terrain) will take the Sprit Trail instead. That's not to say that I don't think it should be designated for cyclists. It would be nice it is were, because t's really annoying if not risky to get from the Spirit Trail back onto the eastbound bike lane on the roadway that starts at Whonoak Road. |
|
| 160191207 | I see that one sign now looking at street level imagery. They aren't the most obvious signs. Where are the other signs? I don't see one for the eastbound direction. |
|
| 160191207 | The Spirit Trail is definitely designated for bicycles, but why did you mark Welch Street and Bridge Road as designated for bicycles? |
|
| 175725934 | I noticed that lines are going to be painted on the pavement, but did not see the stop sign from the angle of my approach. At all other similar intersections, those lines are usually traffic signal stop lines, which is why I changed it to a traffic signal. The placement of a stop sign is non-standard. I now see the back of the stop sign after reviewing photos, and so my change was in error. I'm not sure what you mean by a "crossride", and so I don't understand your point. But to take a guess at what you mean: at the NE corner of the two intersecting bike paths, the kerb where the concrete and asphalt meet appears flush, and the concrete only raises up farther back on the sidewalk, which is why I see it as a flush kerb at the point where it is marked. |
|
| 171934934 | Your edits on Westminster Highway make it looks like there is a second unpaved segregated cycle path on each side that is physically segregated from the roadway, in addition to the bike lane on the right shoulder of the paved roadway. I have removed or corrected those edits. |
|
| 164860378 | I have reverted this changeset, as the erroneous routing around non-existent roundabouts posed a potentially life threatening hazard to cyclists using OSM for real-time navigation. |
|
| 141007686 | Unfortunately the user "henreemash" has put back the roundabouts in his changeset number 164860378. |
|
| 164860378 | They have been replaced with regular intersections with traffic lights. I know because I was just there in person today. |
|
| 164860378 | It looks like you put in two roundabouts on Airport Way at both Bonson Road and Harris Road according to the aerial map. You should know that the aerial map in this area is out of date by at least two years. These roundabouts were removed in 2023. See https://globalnews.ca/news/9948781/pitt-meadows-removes-roundabouts/ |
|
| 159790024 | Good idea. Thanks. |
|
| 158191743 | More barriers have been put up on Telegraph Trail. Need to cycle or drive to see where. |
|
| 134402533 | The latest Esri Map Imagery may be more recent, as I now see a cycle crossing that wasn't there before. That's not surprising, as there was a lot of construction along Fraser Highway at the time mostl likely related to the extension of the Skytrain to Langley. There may still be ongoing construction. |
|
| 134402533 | Both are definitely old. If you use the Esri World Imagery in the iD editor and zoom out, you will see that there are now cycle crossings. Oddly enough when you use Esri World Imagery and zoom in, it reverts to older map images. But my changes are not based on any map imagery. I actually cycled to this intersection and took photos so that I could put in the details of this changeset. |
|
| 150682032 | Thanks. The City's Open Data initiatives have had quality and legal issues, and relying solely on them is foolhardy. They have definitely violated privacy laws in the past with some of the data they have made available in the Portal. I have come across more than my fair share of incompetent and stupid municipal employees. |
|
| 150682032 | Where is this city opendata bikeway dataset? It's a problem when the dataset doesn't match the actual physical road sign posted, and it needs to be reported so that a correction needs to be made either to the dataset or the removal of incorrect signs. |
|
| 149939268 | Where did you get the information that the Cypress bike route ends at Milton? There is a bicycle route sign on SW Marine Drive southbound just before Milton Street that says "SW Marine Ends". It doesn't say "Cypress Ends". |
|
| 147190987 | The Cambie Street road segments that you marked as no longer under construction are actually still under construction. |
|
| 146167255 | Okay. |
|
| 142492596 | The first split was not deliberate on my part. I just put a no U-turn restriction where the two one-way segments join together. Apparently the editor decided that it was necessary to split the road to put in the restriction. The second was when I forgot to merge the segments back together, as I had split them in order to straighten a set of split segments. |
|
| 141797899 | So what tool are you using to monitor changes? |