Thank you felipeeugenio for reaching out.

I usually add elements with Rapid. I do it with care, and spend time rotating them and avoiding overlap. I guess in this case I "accepted" a Rapid suggestion as square building when actually it was round. I could have added a wrong shape by mistake, but surely it is not the norm. And if this is the case, sorry, I would not mind to fix it.

I think referring to "vandalism" is a bit too much.

I confirm that it is a touristic apartment available online. Sorry for the confusion, and thank you for asking.

Hola Felipe,

This "changeset" was created when I added the following touristic apartment, that looks correct to me:
node/13289767501

I think you mean that the "tags" of the "changeset" are strange. I did not know it. I usually use the "iD editor" with my desktop computer, but this time I used my CoMaps app with my smartphone.

In my opinion the CoMaps app should create "changesets" with standard "tags" like: created_by, changeset_count, locale, source.

Therefore, I think it is a bug in CoMaps and I will open a request to fix it.

Do you agree with my understanding?

Hi Alex, thank you for your comment. I did not know about the format of the "wikipedia" tag. I had a look at the other UNESCO churches that I had edited, and I fixed this issue.

Thank you Layft. The reason for the confusion was that I understood "περίπτερο" as "kiosk". OK, from now on I will define them as "shop=convenience".

After some time, I came across to this note again.

At that time I was starting to edit OSM, and I did not know many details. Thank you Layft Greater for your comments.

Now, I had a look at street views, edited it (ensuring for example "crossing=traffic_signals"), and I think that everything is ok.

Unless you have any comment, I will close notes #4408737 and #4408738.

Cheers!

Hi Layft Greater,

I am confused :-) I see two intersections in the extremes of the edited rectangle, which one do you mean? And there are many street lights in both. And the photograph from the car does not help me.

My conclusions:
(1) If you feel confident to update it, please do it.
(2) I will add some "notes" to both intersections, for checking them the next time I pass by there.

Ah, sorry, I did not know this recommendation. I will fix it. Thank you for the comment.

Correction: updated according to name in Post Office (Excel file), not according to sign post.

Correction: updated according to name in Post Office (Excel file), not according to sign post.

I also added info from their website, like their telephone and address.