Hi,
Thank you for your words on this issue, effectively there were discussions on which tag combination makes sense on this single element, but we came to the same conclusion ; you are right it doesn't makes sense to remove the residential landuse regarding the fact it's correct data. We stopped to remove it and we will add it back on the very few refugee camps it has been removed.
We apologize for this.
Thank you for your precious contribution and have a nice day.

Thank you for your comment. We debated the question of the "landuse" tag along with the polygons of the refugee camps, and we came to the conclusion that the 3 tags can appear in the camp polygones:
- amenity=refugee_site (the approved tag) ;
- name=(name of the camp) ;
- landuse=residential. It is of course also possible if the residential area differs from the area of the camp infrastructure, to create a separate polygon for this tag
Since the landuse tag is also used for many analysis, we will take the opportunity of the review we do to add it.

Regarding the second question, I have used the #RefugeeSiteMappingDataGlobalStandardization so I'm not sure what you mean
by your comment.
Don’t hesitate to contact me for any further issue.