revertiert da inkorrekt. Vor Ort ist keine Schneise, sondern ein befestigter geschotterter Weg!
Zugangsbeschränkungen werden dagegen ggf. mit access-tags gemappt.

Bei zwei Wochen she ich das auch so, aber ich finde zwei Monate schon "langfristig".

Egal, ich habe A4>A44 Düsseldorf mal auf sowohl temporary sowie conditional umgetaggt. Letzteres scheint nicht so richtig für sich nicht wiederholende Dinge zu eignen, und Datumsangaben sind auch irgendwie unschön...

Bei den "Ohren" mache ich das aber nicht - da hat der Router ja eine alternative Routingmöglichkeit.

PS: forgot some words: "them all speratedly" refers to explicit access restrictions to forestry

Ok, I found in the wiki that this usage is common in France - did not find anything specifically about Belgium with its two (or three) languages :-)

For me, this differentiation because of the surface is rather surprising since the way is not part of the public roads network regardless of its surface. There are lift-gates and signs all around the whole forest border. With unclassified instead of track, you would have to specifiy them all separatedly? However, I admit that such implicit access rules are problematic by themselves.

Anyway, I would propose to leave it as track because - looking around it - it's local custom.

the change of 17071965 from track/tracktype=grade1 to unclassified does not make sense - it is in the middle of the forest and this way is only allowed for forestry vehicles. I reverted this.