Beste,

Wat is de rol van deze relatie "uitbreiding Madonna"?

Als een aparte relatie in OSM is het fout. Ik kan die koppelen aan een bestaande relatie van lijn 30. Weet u hoe dit stuk uitgebaat wordt? Rijzen vanuit Diksmuide naar Madonna, of vanuit Roeselare? Eindpunt Madonna of in en uit in dezelfe rit?

Groeten.

No problem, the solution was not too difficult and now it will show beautifully on the map.

Is it a true roundabout with D7 signs (osm.wiki/File:Belgian_road_sign_D05.svg)?
If yes, we can put junction=roundabout instead of oneway=yes.

This comment is a duplicate of changeset/130543728

Don't worry, the name has not been deleted from the database, it belongs to the relation here: relation/57639 The relation is okay.

Ordinary railway tracks do not have names. If you see "L161" on the list of ways on this changeset page, it is only because osm.org uses the ref to show the objects when the name tag is empty. Click on any of those ways and you will see how it is tagged.

.

We fixed it.

@Matus1978: sorry but your change was not good, we had set a timer to execute this today at midnight, to ensure smooth operation of apps.

Hi.

stop_area_group relations are mostly a deprecated scheme. Apart from very specific mobility hubs such as interchange stations between two subway lines no-one uses them anymore.

In case somebody wants to use them (properly), they must contain all the stop_area relations of multiple stops. It contained two members that proved to be duplicates for the same stop. I removed one duplicate and now we had this problem with "1-member relation" shown by Osmose.

I’ve just removed the stop_area_group here, no need to worry anymore.

Ja, bedankt voor de steun. 👍️
Het is inderdaad de bedoeling om alle buslijnen langs de Misiabrug te tekenen.
Een taak voor de komende dagen, hopelijk.

Hallo

Deze opmerking is niet verbonden aan mijn changeset (121140820) mbt. de buslijnen.

De naam komt van changeset/116977402: way/1027477066/history

1582 is the normal stop towards Bordet Station. The OpenData GTFS does not give a real image of the network, only the stops that are operated during a 14-day period, and those lists will change often.
In STIB/MIVB internal carto the stop is set as 1582TMP for the moment because the buses are diverted, that is why you won't find it in the GTFS.

Hi there: what do you mean? Are you suggesting the service stop on the boulevard is no longer there? This is the stop where buses are parked between trips. Is the terminus operated differently now?

Hi there: There was a mistake in the data import here, Bon Air/Schone Lucht and Pommier/Appelboom were mixed. I spotted the mistake too and fixed it yesterday.

Apologies to everyone about this unusually large bounding box.
It wasn’t intended: I inadvertently re-used an existing object instead of duplicating it, as I thought I did.

Ja, u hebt gelijk, die groot gebied met amenity=bus_station is fout, omdat way/757851076 reeds bestaat en is correct.

Ik heb het probleem opgelost.

Ik begrijp maar "Oostende Station" is de naam die de reizigers willen/moeten zien op de tramlijn. Die twee nodes zijn de twee perrons, één per richting.
Idealiter zou men de perrons als `ways` moeten tekenen, zoals in Berlijn of Brussel, om dit volledig op te lossen.
Hebt u suggesties, misschien?

Hi!
Most stop_area_group relations in this city were gone already, or were outdated. We couldn’t find any use that couldn’t be covered with established stop_area relations.
Do you really need that? How can we help?