Die Relationen hier haben ein merkwürdiges Tag "ticket:germanytick", das sieht nach einem Fehler aus. Schaust du mal nach?

Hi,
you used a "crossarm = double" tag which doesn't exist in other places. Could you check the wiki to see how that feature is commonly tagged?

Hi,
please check the relation you added here - none of the tags are used in another place.

Hi,
please explain what you added here. I spotted many issues here:

I see many plots with a high wall around them, without gates so nobody can enter them.

They are all tagged as 'garden', but many have buildings on them.

All of them are named "UD" with "UD" also being the housenumber.

The whole thing is tagged as farmland.

There a huge wall all around everything that cuts of every street entering the area.

There are many nodes with just a "addr:country" tag.

and several more.

"osmc" has no meaning anymore - it was a prefix for a special map 15+ years ago, but now it's just a regular tag used by several apps.
osmc:symbol=*

The correct value would be "::yellow_bar" or ":yellow_bar", depending on if it's just a yellow bar, or a bar on a background.

Hi,
you used the tag "name:loymerbus" here - there is a new scheme for these names: "name:network:loymerbus"
name:network:=**

Nein, im Wiki steht das nicht. "ref:..." mit einem spezifischen Suffix ist sehr weit verbreitet.

Wenn das eine Referenznummer des Herstellers ist, gibt es auch "ref:manufacturer".

'direction_north:symbol' is mentioned in the Wiki - but is rather for icons and not symbols.

'direction_north:osmc:symbol' is indeed not documented, e.g. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/direction_north%3Aosmc%3Asymbol

It's using the common syntax of osmc:symbol to describe the symbols shown on the sign.

Hallo,
'replacement_service' wird noch nirgends verwendet, aber es gibt bereits
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/rail_replacement_service

Müsste hier doch auch passen?

OK. I can take care later today.
Maybe you can find out if they are willing to give their data to OSM and then add them again with just the power=tower and source tags.

There are leftovers that have been edited in this changeset:
changeset/186733059

Should these be reverted as well?

26 davon gibt es noch - schaust du die noch an?

Hallo,
du hast Parkplätze erfasst mit

access= yes
parking:access =no
parking:motorcar =designated

"parking:motorcar" gibt es so nicht - und "parking:access" widerspricht "access".
Was gilt hier genau?

We could simply revert it.
But we could also remove the wrong tags and change to proper ones. The main thing to clarify first is: What is the source of the data? Is its license compatible with the requirements for OSM?

This import went wrong.
All the nodes have a large amount of foreign tags that shouldn't be in OSM.
The mandatory documentation and source is missing.
Please read and follow our import guidelines before doing any import:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi,
you added many "name_cicl" tags to roads. This tag is not used in any place. If there is a signed bicycle route with this name, please don't add a name to each of the ways, but create a relation instead:
route=bicycle

Hi,
what does 'name_ciclo' mean? Does the cycleway have its own name?

Hi,
this train station got a strange "sponson=Claro" tag - could you chack that?
node/4143521761

Hi,
what is this area? way/442758983
"well_site" seems a bit strange - maybe access to underground tanks?

Hi,
'loop=yes' looks like a mistake - I guess it should be 'roundtrip' on the relation?