Hallo und willkommen bei OSM.
bitte wirf einen Blick ins Wiki, wie Tiergehege üblicherweise getagged werden - oder vergleiche auch mit anderen Zoos.
osm.wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dzoo

Generell müssen Dinge wie "Fläche" und "Umfang" nicht getaggt werden - das ergibt sich ganz einfach aus dem Objekt selbst.

Hi,
"horse:boarding" is a new tag. We do have amenity=animal_boarding
Could you check if this is applicable here?

Hi,
please check the fuel tags. It should be 'propane', not 'propame'.

Please don't just dump data from other sources into OSM!
If you want to import data, please read and follow our import guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi,
"name:zh_zhuyin" doesn't exist. The proper tag is "name:zh-Bopo" - which already exists on the objects you edited.

If it's not clear what the meaning of "sharp_disposal" is, then I say it shouldn't be imported into OSM at all.

Hi,
some just have a "area=yes", but not a building tag.
You can add some descriptions, but better use a common tag. Either "note", if it is information for mappers, or "description" if it might also be useful for others.
Some of the comments look like a bit too subjective to be of real use in OSM, but the real facts can for sure be there - and also deserve the proper tags like roof:material or building:colour.

Hi,
could you check the objects you uploaded? Some look like your field notes, but not like properly tagged objects in OSM, e.g.
way/1482125168

Hi,
you added the tag "canoe:oneway" - the common version would be "oneway:canoe", like on any street: The type of vehicle is usually added as a subkey.

Hi,
what is a "toilets:sharp_disposal"? This tag isn't used in any place

Hi,
could you check these golf areas? Some of them have strange tags like "name_Org2" or strange names.

Thanks!

Hi,
could you explain the meaning of 'hazmat:distance'? This tag isn't used in other places.

Hi,
"crossing:markings:colour:bicycle" is not used in other places.

What is in use on other "mixed" crossings are these tags:
cycleway:crossing:markings:colour
footway:crossing:markings:colour

Could you check that?

Please stop this import, provide a proper documentation as required by our import guidelines.

The geometries of many of these objects don't make sense and don't correspond to anything that can be seen in aerial images, e.g. here:
changeset/178785613#map=19/-6.915442/110.698092&layers=N

I guess all these imports should be reverted.

Hi,
please don't just dump data from some external sources into OSM. Any import has to follow our import guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

I'm going to revert this for now so that you can start over with a clean import after clarifying all details such as tagging, sources and licenses.

Hi,
please don't add names to roads that don't have names in these languages. E.g. this road for sure doesn't have a name in Latin, Middle English, in a peculiar script used in Utah or some Jamaican language.

Also, please don't use link shorteners, but always add the direct link to images.

Hi,
could you explain what "lobby hours" and "ibanker hours" are?

Hi,
is this really "cql_location" and not "cqc_location"?

node/13542983926#map=19/50.714775/-3.544917&layers=N

Hi,
"diet:muslim-friendly" is not a common tag - what exactly does it mean? Does the cafe offer halal food?

Hi,
could you point us to the mandatory documentation of this import?
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

You also added ways with a huge amount of foreign tags which clearly shouldn't be in OSM.