OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
68355013

Dear Metro Vancouver,

what's the purpose of your edit?

67722224

Hi Sean,

way/674119053 is a spur line. May you please tag spur and yard tracks in future?

Yours sincerely

64688339

Hi Russ,

am I right, that these are exclusively _former_ gas works? Are you sure, that landuse=industrial is still the right tagging for this? Additionally industrial=gas is a very generic tag, to be replaced by pipeline=substation if applicable.

Best wishes, Mr. Landuse

64602570

Please don't fix features mechanically. Some of the farms should have been converted into multipolygons or splitted because they e.g. contain christmas tree plantations.
Nevertheless: Thanks and keep going with your work!

64243591

Please read generator:source=solar if you haven't deliberately tagged the solar farm your way.

64235556

I can still see some power line at way/317284445/history -> May you please check this?

63864821

Take a look at the Wiki or compare literally every other wind farm relation.

29479517

Ain't this way/322170462 the Touro College of Dental Medicine and not IBM Research?

57936824

Sofort sperren, der Mann ist ein Exhibitionist! Obwohl – Frau Mönning sähe das wohl nicht so eng ...

61900575

My opinion: In the languages of the neighbouring countries (Sweden & Finland) there is Bottenviken + Bottenhavet and not one big "Gulf of Bothnia". And besides this definition problem: Have you used a valid source for the extents of the Gulf? Or just invented something?

62042396

This is a revert of 20+ changesets of user "M!dgard". I consider splitting the same work into multiple changeset to hamper detection and possible revertion not as a good faith edit.
Regards

50363389

In Китай the people speek Chinese, so please don't use Bulgarian names!

51563377

You've inserted a non-existing level_crossing and made the two railway tracks twist. Why?

58894488

+1

58522113

I'm deeply sorry for this. But what about using a unique relation type for collections like this?

49931700

I've just reverted your changeset.

Please try to import this data again, it's valuable information.

But please _verify_ that there are no preexisting dams where you are importing some. If so, you have to add your tags to the existing features.

58564469

Hi trekker,

this is no power tower. It's an artifacts which was introduced by erroneously connecting another feature to the power line.

Greetings

50143235

Hi tommy,

plesae make sure, that you merge your tags into any existing dam geometries. For example at Manatali barrage you've imported a dam (way/506146312) over the existing geometry (way/190325901) which was of higher quality.

I really like it when good data is imported, but when the import is done technically bad, I will remove it!

See also at the import from bsmith54: changeset/49931700

57708787

Hi greecemapper,
what are you refining here?