مرحبا 𒂼𒄄;
شكرا لك علي تواصلك معنا, لقد قمت فقط بحذف هذا التاج "oneway"
ولم اقم بتعديل اي تاجات للاسم "name".
ولكن قد تقصد اليوزر "Hasan Muhaimen 2015"
فهو الذي قام بتغيره
@Hasan%20Muhaimen%202015
مع أطيب التمنيات
 محمد أحمد

Hello MarvelousExterminator,
I hope you're doing well! Thank you for your continued contributions to OpenStreetMap.
I was curious about the addition of the "M15" value to the ref tag for certain streets (way/220440681, way/292575616, way/372368202, way/496991171)
in the changesets (changeset/177384505)(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177385124)
Where the same value represents "int_ref" for these streets, and the int_ref value is true according to (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Mashreq_International_Road_Network)
But I was wondering if ref and int_ref tags have the same value
If you have a source that confirms this action, can you share it with us?
Best regards,
Mohamedd Ahmed

Hi Alsalehq80,
Thank you for your comment.
The road was marked as under construction based on the latest Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-11-28.
If you have more up-to-date or local information confirming that the road is fully open and not under construction, please share any official sources regarding this update with me.
Best regards,
mohamedd_ahmed

Hello CRCulver;
I wish you a pleasant journey.
I have fixed the road classifications in the changeset:
changeset/175806768
And thanks again
Best regards,
mohamedd_ahmed

Hello again, CRCulver,
Thank you for the clarification.
I just want to clarify my point briefly:
Some of the ways you tagged as _link are not actually link roads — they are simply continuations or forks of the main road.
In these cases, it is more consistent to give them the same classification as the main road, because they don’t function as ramps or connectors between two roads of different hierarchy.
You can check that in the OSM wiki:
osm.wiki/Highway_link
If you believe these specific links are correctly tagged, could you share the reasoning for each one? It would help ensure we’re aligned on how link roads should be handled.
Thanks again for the discussion.
Best regards,
mohamedd_ahmed

Hello CRCulver,
Thank you for your contributions to OSM,
I noticed that you've changed the classification of some streets to primary_link and secondary_link in the following changesets:
changeset/175661839
changeset/175666381
For example :
openstreetmap.org/way/223255079/history
openstreetmap.org/way/223255038/history
openstreetmap.org/way/223156731/history
openstreetmap.org/way/207225641/history
openstreetmap.org/way/409878349/history
openstreetmap.org/way/207216108/history
I believe it might be better to revert to the previous classification,
as the current classification may not fully match its actual function. You can check that in the OSM wiki:
highway=secondary_link
highway=primary_link
If you have a different point of view, please share that with us.
If not, could you please review these changes and revert them?
Thank you again for your efforts and for helping to improve the map!
Best regards,
mohamedd_ahmed

Hello jmty8;
Thank you for noticing that and I fixed it in this changeset
Link for changeset: changeset/166420142
Regards
mohamedd_ahmed