I appreciate it, thanks.

Hi, I don’t agree with the removal. This area has historically been known as “London” allegedly due to some terraced houses in the area as typically seen in London. Anyway, you can refer to the official map of the Municipality of Ljubljana where London is also listed: https://zemljevid.ljubljana.si/web/profile.aspx?id=Javni@LJ_MZ&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

London is also mentioned on the info board in this area: https://mapy.com/s/jevosagose

And here: https://www.hiking-trail.net/hiking_trip/ljubljana_london_mazovnik_golovec/25/1430/2410

In short, that’s more than enough evidence to keep it, so I’m kindly asking you to revert your edit.

Best regards

PS.: I'm glad you found my mapping useful. :)

I think you can use osmcha.org or similar websites to check that, but I'm not sure how to use that properly. What exactly did you fix of the paths I had previously added?

As for the loop, at the time of adding it I thought I'd only add the waymarked relation with name to the top of the 3 mountain "peaks" and then tag the remaining section merely as a marked relation (without name), but on second thoughts maybe I'll just change it into a loop indeed.

Hi, I believe the lettering grade is commonly used in Slovenia and neighboring countries. You could probably also use the value 2 instead of B here.

Hi, I noticed you removed the hiking route relation to Rjautza. It seems this relation is listed on the official ÖAV Wegedatenbank website as 663 Rjautza, so shouldn't we add back a relation here?

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/6974b375d78f4eee866b317dca159d4f

Hi, how come you removed the osmc symbol from Via Alpina Red route?

Sure, sounds good! I considered that too, but wasn't sure about it. Thanks

Thank! I'll have to look into it.

Ah, good. So they changed it as per my change in OSM. :) Where can I see the order of the ways in the relation and how to change them?

Ok, let me know about their reply, please. Thanks

By the way, description and pictures from the above hike.uno link refer to the condition of September 2023 and June 2022.

Yes, I see that variation now - you are talking about this track, correct? way/1389544922

This one was previously not even mapped! So I added it and mapped 605 on this new track as per my colleague's gpx and this description where it clearly says to go RIGHT (and later pass by the cottage/hut), not left: https://www.hike.uno/view_tour/malborghetto_cima_alta_due_pizzi_path_605/560300

From the picture itself, it seems that there is indeed a marking on the right tree if you look closely. Implying that this track would be the correct way: way/1389544922

But do check with CAI if possible and we can correct if needed.

If there are any specific sections of 605 that you are concerned about, please do let me know which parts in particular - and I’ll recheck with my acquaintance.

Hi, I used 2 gpx files of my acquaintance's who hiked one part of 605 in Aug 2020 and the other one in Oct 2021, respectively. According to him, he stuck to the marked route.

As far as I can see, the last changes to the path in OSM were made in Jun/Jul 2020 (and some even in 2018), which is before the gpx's I used for reference. My corrections according to the gpx also align with Strava heatmap and the latest ortophoto (where the path is visible) you provided me with before.

If you believe that some changes are incorrect, please feel free to correct.

Ja, tako sem potem tudi storil. :)
Lp

Pozdravljeni,

opazil sem, da ste oba tale odseka do Dominovega doma (way/886955250) označili kot "private". Ali ste 100% prepričani, da je res privat? Na terenu nisem zasledil kakšnih oznak. Glede na to, da nad Dominovim domom poteka pot, bi bilo smiselno vsaj s prvega dela tega odseka odstraniti tag za privat, tisti drugi del odseka, ki vodi direktno do Dominovega doma, pa magari pustimo privat.. bo tako ok?

Lp

Zdravo, tale kolovoz je prvotno vrisal uporabnik T0M0360, jaz pa sem potem naknadno urejal/poravnaval pot, ki se stika s tem kolovozom in obenem poskusil še dele kolovoza poravnati glede na Lidar podlago reliefa.

Vsekakor pa mi je bil že od začetka sumljiv predvsem tale del (osm.org/?mlat=46.402163&mlon=14.272023#map=17/46.402163/14.272023), ki poteka od tega razpotja proti levi (zahodu), tako da če poti ni, je seveda smiselno, da se jo izbriše.

Tukaj, kjer je speljan pa tale drugi del kolovoza, pa se po Lidar podlagi vidi neko špuro/zarezo v reliefu, ki bi lahko bila slabši kolovoz pot, zato se mi ta del ni zdel tako sporen: osm.org/?mlat=46.403421&mlon=14.275178#map=17/46.403421/14.275178

Žal pa še nisem imel časa raziskati, tako da če ste prepričani, da tam ni ničesar, vam prepuščam, da izbrišete vse dele poti, kjer ste prepričani, da je na terenu ni.

Lp

Lucija SUBURB? Odakle ti to?

I see, thanks!