Hi, I think that was a mistake, should've been office=parish and building=presbytery, which is what I changed it into now.

Hi, Triglav is not T6, but is certainly more than T3, such as here for example: way/39354887

Should definitely be at least T4. I changed it now. Please be more careful in the future, as such changes could be highly misleading for casual hikers.

Are you referring to this route? relation/21143404

Hi,
do you have any evidence that this track is private for all?? way/1192528490

Hi, are you sure this is an observation tower and not just a hunting stand?

Thanks for the reply. I merged the node with the building as there's no need for duplicate tags (previously the building was tagged as observation tower + there was an observation tower node in it so the tower rendered twice). Please check and see if that's ok now. Regards

Hi,
Are you sure this is in fact an observation tower and not just a hunting stand (which is what I suspect)? way/1366981776

Yes, indeed... no worries, it's good that you pointed it out. T3 was quite unreasonable, I'd say.

This SAC scale had been there from before, wasn't me who added it (although it strangely appears as if I were the one who first mapped this path?!). T1 and T2 as per how you changed it should be fine, yeah.

I appreciate it, thanks.

Hi, I don’t agree with the removal. This area has historically been known as “London” allegedly due to some terraced houses in the area as typically seen in London. Anyway, you can refer to the official map of the Municipality of Ljubljana where London is also listed: https://zemljevid.ljubljana.si/web/profile.aspx?id=Javni@LJ_MZ&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

London is also mentioned on the info board in this area: https://mapy.com/s/jevosagose

And here: https://www.hiking-trail.net/hiking_trip/ljubljana_london_mazovnik_golovec/25/1430/2410

In short, that’s more than enough evidence to keep it, so I’m kindly asking you to revert your edit.

Best regards

PS.: I'm glad you found my mapping useful. :)

I think you can use osmcha.org or similar websites to check that, but I'm not sure how to use that properly. What exactly did you fix of the paths I had previously added?

As for the loop, at the time of adding it I thought I'd only add the waymarked relation with name to the top of the 3 mountain "peaks" and then tag the remaining section merely as a marked relation (without name), but on second thoughts maybe I'll just change it into a loop indeed.

Hi, I believe the lettering grade is commonly used in Slovenia and neighboring countries. You could probably also use the value 2 instead of B here.

Hi, I noticed you removed the hiking route relation to Rjautza. It seems this relation is listed on the official ÖAV Wegedatenbank website as 663 Rjautza, so shouldn't we add back a relation here?

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/6974b375d78f4eee866b317dca159d4f

Hi, how come you removed the osmc symbol from Via Alpina Red route?

Sure, sounds good! I considered that too, but wasn't sure about it. Thanks

Thank! I'll have to look into it.

Ah, good. So they changed it as per my change in OSM. :) Where can I see the order of the ways in the relation and how to change them?

Ok, let me know about their reply, please. Thanks