No problem, I just like to know more information on the issues because I don't work with OSM anymore. I made some changes on changeset/96412783#map=15/46.7820/23.5843 is this what you suggested?
JOSM also gives warnings on these issues but none of them are marked as errors, just suspicious tags.
Matei

First, these changes were made over six years ago when the number of features on OSM was much lower in the area. To geocode an address from the OSM database multiple queries had to be made to get the street name, number, city, county, country etc and it seemed normal to me to get some of that information directly from the road tags.
Regarding the big problems, all I can do is select all of the ways with JOSM and delete the tags but as I didn't edit OSM for a long time I wouldn't want to cause more big problems. I think it would be best for me to stay away from OSM from now on because all I get are negative comments and let the ones that have the right skills edit it.
Please let me know if I can help you and give me more information, consider that I only heard about osmose now and I don't know where this bug you mention is documented.

Hello,
The borders were extracted from Landsat images about five years ago, probably there are differences now. They can be deleted but I don't know exactly which borders you are talking about. If you cannot delete them I will take a look.
Matei

Thanks for the up. The data was extracted through remote sensing from the Landsat images I had available at that time. Most of the forests and lakes I added in 2015 are extracted with the same methods. I am aware that more recent data is available now and the resolution is higher. Also, I only added areas that were small enough to handle by hand and checked most of them over Bing as far as I remember. Since I did this JOSM evolved and data can be improved but when I added these there was nothing on landuse in the areas.