Thanks for the quick action there. Happy mapping!

Hi, can you help with this note?
note/5304902

Woooow! This changeset is way too large. Please create *much* smaller changesets.

I've restored the natural=basin tag on relation/11793464 in changeset/182852712

Happy mapping!

Hi, thanks for your contribution to OSM.

You've added a lot nodes for climbing sites. However, for these climbing sites, there are already existing ways, for example you've created node/13714772713, although way/680223515 already exists. Hence, there are now duplicates (2 OSM objects for one real-world feature), which is undesirable.

Hi,
Welcome to openstreetmap! Helping hands are always needed and your contribution is very valuable.

A small note: I've noticed that you seem to use the name=* tag in a wrong manner: You use it to *describe* things. For example here node/13718430188 you gave the name "Bank" to a bench. This is wrong. because "Bank" is probably not the *name* of the bench. The information that the thing is a bench is already in the amenity=bench tag.

Most things don't have a name (benches, trees, waste bins, fences). So, just leave the name=* tag empty in these cases.

I hope this clears things up. If not, don't hesitate to ask!

Happy mapping! :-)

Hi, thanks a lot for the edit. Is the name "Gozdna učna pot Tabot" on node/13686155668 correct or is that a typo?

Hi,
Can you help with this note? You mapped allotments, but another user says there aren't any.

note/5102185

Wow, this is a HUGE changeset! (We try to keep them much smaller whenever possible).

Are you sure way/49782685 is called "Wurzenpass" on the Slovene side?

Closes note/4881922

Hi, can you help with this note?
note/4526273

It seems you've mapped a gondola a part of a "site" relation. I have no expertise with this kind of relations, but it seems a bit odd to me on first glance. Would it perhaps be more appropriate to remove the gondola from the site relation and potentially create a public transport relation for the gondola instead?

Thanks!

Seems enough evidence that this was a simple mapping mistake. I've removed the guest house.

Thanks for the swift reply.

Ok, I guess some of them can be considered residential buildings. I've added them on the map.

Ich habe incline=100% hinzugefügt.

Thanks for the swift reply! I've just corrected it.

Hi, you've changed the maxspeed from 30 to 20 on way/669235159.

However, this sign seems to indicate 30. Can you help?
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.7406623,13.8236223,3a,22.9y,338.15h,84.84t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s__hjC_Xcw_jyjLFqCAxvmQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D5.160230088217389%26panoid%3D__hjC_Xcw_jyjLFqCAxvmQ%26yaw%3D338.1489044919778!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQyMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Hi, bicycle=designated is implied on a highway=cycleway, so I'm removing the tag from www.way/669235159

Hi, thanks for detailing the area. Ways like this are probably better tagged highway=unclassified as it is clearly not in a residential area: way/1418759801

Hi, you added the proposed highway way/584156177 seven years ago. It seems it hasn't materialized yet. Is it still map-worthy?

Hi, you added the proposed highway way/585221411 seven years ago. It seems it hasn't materialized yet. Is it still map-worthy?