OpenStreetMap
markbegbie's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 177462452 | Comment error. Actually modifying residential landuse polygon. |
|
| 172738052 | Thanks! I'm not finished it, will have more time M the next day or two. I actually wondered about this. My thinking was that farmyard=stockyard is a refinement of landuse=farmyard. However, as a sale yard, the appropriate primary tag seemed to be landuse=commercial. Interested in opinions or precedent on how to deal with this. |
|
| 141439252 | You added address tags to a highway, which you should not do. Also, the tags related to an address which is some distance further down the road.
|
|
| 140033477 | Hi, you deleted the building tag from this way which meant it was not recognised as a feature on the map.
|
|
| 123104877 | No worries - nice to connect with someone else in the NZ OSM community. |
|
| 123104877 | Hi,
If you look at 37 James Cook Drive, the building outline includes everything out to the boundary fence. This catches two paved areas in front of the house, one of which (the drive) contains a fire hydrant. Similarly numbers 20 and 36 contain large areas as building which are, in fact, garden. I'm using JOSM, which has access to recent LINZ imagery that has a lot of detail. I spent a while using MapWithAI (through JOSM) but found it is prone to being quite badly off with building outlines. I now tend not to use it for that reason, but YMMV of course. |
|
| 123104877 | The guidelines for importing from MapWithAI are quite explicit about checking the outlines for each building before importing it. It is quite clear from this changeset you are not doing this. Can you please correct these buildings and check future outlines before importing from MapWithAI? |
|
| 123106856 | Please check each of the outlines in MapWithAI data sets before importing them into the OpenstreetMap database. This applies to each individual building. Much of this edit is incorrect. |
|
| 115817475 | Hi, you seem to have marked the whole of the Te Rerenga trail as being in a tunnel. Have corrected this now. |
|
| 126174743 | Apologies, this was StreetComplete combining changes, despite auto submit being enabled. |
|
| 126456020 | Hi,
I was using StreetComplete to provide updates on this occasion. Without me knowing, it combined changes in the UK and NZ into one changeset. (these relate to where I used to live and where I now live so are indeed based on survey and local knowlege). I actually spent about 20 minutes last night trying to work out how to split the changeset that StreetComplete had created, or delete it and redo it as separate sets. If you can tell me of a way to either split or delete the changeset that would be great. I now have a better understanding of how StreetComplete manages submissions, and can avoid it happening in future (I hope). |
|
| 105552689 | There is a waterway marked as a track with incorrect layer and tunnel tags as well.
|
|
| 119780360 | Does the Hanar and Zhima Market occupy the whole building? If so, you could tag
|
|
| 119781170 | Hi there Stuzz - welcome to OSM, this edit's looking good. Can I make one suggestion? On the rainwater collection tanks you could add:
|
|
| 104987544 | Building outlines mass imported from MapWithAI without manual check for accuracy.
|
|
| 117190734 | It wasn't an import. Was all individually checked / adjusted from imagery or MapWithAI layer.
|
|
| 114437507 | Turns out I'd made a typo in the data for the building tool in JOSM, which is why it wasn't picked up, but also would have been a continual problem if you'd not spotted it. |
|
| 114437507 | Thanks for catching that! |
|
| 79133047 | Hi there,
|
|
| 105152253 | Buildings brought in from the LINZ building layers should be done manually so that the outlines can be checked / corrected as required.
|