No worries.
I'm trying to revitalise Osmalyzer, and it actually noticed this)

Actually, I found photo from 09.2025: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1460316635177126
It's still a parking machine. Will retag it back.

I'm pretty sure that node/10981967339 is not a ticket vending machine but a parking machine. It was a parking automat at least from 2020 until 2024 (based on Mapillary), and I can't imagine why a ticket vending machine might be replacing it in this location.

Yes, with this one I was finished.
I missed bench closer to bushes.
"bike parking" (if the one next to bench) is not a bike parking, but rather a left over from removed playground. "Planters" are bins from same playground on their sides.

But I understand what you mean. I'll reopen note here, and will be closing them less liberally

I new that it was reoccurring, since it was also missing last winter, and then it was back in summer. Just wasn't sure if it is actually buried or removed, because sand level (based on changing booths) seemed quite constant.

Regarding seasonal and routing - I don't think it matters very much. In winter sand there is quite compacted even when not frosen, so same route will be navigable at similar levels.

I don't think it is actually under sand, but rather it is removed for winter.

Description of the project (admittedly when in was only planned) says "Laipa ir demontējama uz ziemas sezonu" which if I understand it correctly means that boardwalk is removable for winter.
https://balso.riga.lv/projekti/vecaku-pastaigu-laipa

Thanks for advice: I sometimes adjust bing, but not always. Will keep this in mind.
With noexit - it seems my assumptions were wrong. Thanks for pointing that out, too

Yes, it was discussed at the time in local chat

Whoops, sorry, missed a dot in script.

Corrected.

May I ask why have you added translation of the name and not transliteration? I mean, as far as I can tell, there is no particular reason to do so.

I based my understanding on this wiki page: amenity=recycling#Recycling_type:
> `amenity=vending_machine` + `vending=bottle_return` for all machines that accept bottles, cans and crates which return.
and considered ambiguous tagging as undesired.

I see that I might be wrong here. Please consider joining discussion here: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/358602-general/topic/depoz.C4.ABta.20punkti and help us get to a consensus.

Not great. As a novice in tagging, I try to err on side of caution. And when I see warnings, I assume that it's my fault, not editor's (except for obviously ignored by somebody else previously warnings, like happens a lot with crossings).

Thanks for correcting!
I had same exact problem with somewhat similar "air corridor" here: way/475617182

I fixed it in a similar way, as you explained.

I still fill a bit confused regarding path underneath. Once I extended building and added building part, path had warnings. I think (but not really sure for now) that warning gone away once I placed points of separation of the path (for `covered=yes`) onto the contour of the building. But I'll figure this out.

Thanks again for you guidance!

It has 523, with "Izņemot ar RTK atļaujām".
After reading what the `access=permit` means I agree.
Thanks for clarification and guidance.