Hello, Shinaut, and welcome to OSM. Please do not delete existing objects and then re-draw the same object. Instead please edit the existing object so the editing history of the object is preserved. Thanks.

Hello, dmpushcar, and welcome to OSM. Please do not delete existing objects and then re-draw the same objects. Instead, edit the existing object so the editing history of the object is preserved. Thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82769015

Hello, frodogolf, and welcome to OSM. Please do not delete existing objects and then re-draw the same object. Instead please edit the existing object so the history of the object is preserved. Thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82791691

john2660, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Some things need your attention though. You have tee boxes next to the 9th green. Is this correct? Which hole will you be hitting to from there? You have tee boxes for the 7th hole in the woods. Is this correct? Please check your work carefully and fix the errors. Also, please do not delete existing objects and then re-draw the same object. Instead, edit the existing object so the history of the object is preserved. Thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82795450

Please do not delete existing objects and then re-draw new objects to replace them. Instead, edit the existing object so the history of the object is retained.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82833382

123maps, can you tell us the source for the changes you made, extending Lindsey Court a block to intersect with South Haskell St?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82801441

christianflores, good changeset comments are a basic good practice in OSM. Please review osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82476394

Looks like something went wrong with the reversion. Check out Node: 2821297477

Please use something a little more descriptive than "Edited the map." That's what we're all doing everyday. Please state what you edited in each changeset. Thanks.

It's not good practice to ignore comments from other mappers.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82205962

Some paths are marked as one-way and thus validation shows them as having no way out. Is this what you intended?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82479524

This changeset has produced several hundred orphan nodes (points with no tags). Please clean them up.

I know it's almost a year ago but a number of objects that you mapped in are set to the wrong layer. I'm fixing them but please be careful. Thanks.

Just a suggestion...save your edits in each locality as separate changesets. This changeset covers most of the globe.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82312974

I checked all the bridges in this changeset and they should be ok now. I'm not sure what happened with the errors but I appreciate your bringing them to my attention and thanks for fixing them.

I will be happy to go back and fix them if you haven't done so already.

Will do. I understand there will be some bridges that will need to be fixed but they are much easier to find with validation than to trace the length of every stream just in case there are bridges.

I definitely know what a split is and what it involves, and that simply doesn't explain the edits I'm looking at. I'm not going to pursue this conversation any further. I'll just fix the errors and move on.

No these edits are on I-84 that has had dual carriageways for years before your edits.

OK, but why are they version 1 objects?