Is the area along Sandy Creek really a municipal protected area? Or should it be a "river area"? osm.wiki/Rivers#Water_area

Will do.

How about landuse=basin and basin=evaporation and content=slurry? One of the uses on basin=evaporation
iincludes: "Preventing pesticides, fertilizers and salts from agricultural wastewater from contaminating the water bodies they would flow into."

I encourage you to review the Wiki information on "private". It indicates that "private" is intended for use when there is a physical barrier, such as a locked gate, that prevents access to the way,, and should not be used for most driveways. Thanks.

FWIW, Osmose can detect well over 200 types of errors, and it fixed quite a variety of them during my changesets. I'm not going to list all of them but most fixed deprecated or unnecessary tags. Very few (if any) were in your editing area so it's unlikely anything was changed that would affect your edits.

Sorry about that. Will do.

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/

Check it now to see if it passes inspection.

You are welcome!

Often there are multiple issues associated with an object that Osmose flags but it will identify only one at a time so it usually requires that any area be inspected several times to fix everything. The unnecessary "one-way" tags were the only thing flagged by Osmose on that pass. I have fixed the ones you listed.

I doubt this changeset had anything to do with the warnings but nevertheless I have reverted it as you requested.

@SomeoneElse - Since the edits were done about a year ago I don't remember the precise reasons but probably JOSM validation identified the reference to Google as tags that should be removed. I will be happy to revert the changeset.

Sorry for the problem. But I don't understand what happened. The other 999 changesets were fine. ;-)

Sorry for the problem. You are welcome to restore the data if it is still relavant 11 years later.

Sorry about that..

No problem. Thanks for letting me know.

FYI, I have fully reverted this changeset so you can take another look at the points I deleted and determine whether their deletion damaged any of your work.

Can you give me an example of nodes with no tags that are children of ways?

Thanks for your comment. Deleting points with no tags would not result in invalid polygons.

Thanks.

Thanks for your comments. Actually I read that page but misunderstood what it was saying. And the riverbank edits I made were sort of experiments. Thanks for fixing them and I'll make sure I use the correct tagging from now on.