mapman44's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 83154256 | almost 6 years ago | Thanks for your edits. Just a caution...be careful when using Bing satellite imagery. It is useful primarily because it is newer that some others, but there is more distortion and very often objects drawn to it do not line up with the other satellite imagery providers. When using Bing (or any satellite imagery) be sure to adjust the image offset to line up with the existing streets before drawing new objects or making changes. Here's the Wiki page: osm.wiki/Using_Imagery
|
| 83117750 | almost 6 years ago | Your edits are intentionally damaging the map and will be reverted.
|
| 83112012 | almost 6 years ago | Good changeset comment! Thanks
|
| 83103529 | almost 6 years ago | Why have you deleted most of the elements of this golf course? It appears that you are starting to re-create them now but you have destroyed the work of other editors and the edit history of those elements.
|
| 83104360 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, cnytops, and thanks for your interest in OSM. Please do not delete existing objects and then re-draw essentially the same object. Instead edit the existing object so the edit history is preserved. Often it may appear that the outline of a green or fairway wasn't drawn well but it may be simply because the previous editor was using different satellite imagery than you. Thanks. |
| 82794842 | almost 6 years ago | Thanks for your replies. Just be aware that anyone can edit things such as forest land to reflect all the adjacent forest rather than just one parcel. |
| 83079689 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, Brother Paul, and thanks for your interest in OSM. Golf course can be fun to map but getting the right tags for different areas is important for everything to display correctly. You may want to check out this page in the Wiki: leisure=golf_course |
| 83085417 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, jchristianson33, and thanks for your interest in OSM. I was wondering why the last three houses on Southwood Drive were deleted. The latest satellite imagery I can find still shows them. Thanks. |
| 83072657 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, MrAtoms, and thanks for your contributions to OSM. Are all those criss-crossing sidewalks the best way to map them? Wouldn't just connecting the six sidewalks at one central point do the job, plus simplifying the map a lot? Thanks. |
| 82794842 | almost 6 years ago | [TASF]Overkill, some of your edits look good, but others seem to have no support from the latest satellite imagery. Obviously anything added to the map should actually exist in real life on the ground. What is your source for the existence of the driveway you added cutting across the open field? Thanks.
|
| 83080245 | almost 6 years ago | Please changeset notes that describe what you edited. Good changeset notes are a basic good practice for OSM. Please review osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 83058969 | almost 6 years ago | Please review the Wiki page on the "image" tag. Only one image is allowed for each object and it must meet specific criteria. The Wiki page is at: image=*
|
| 83058656 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, StargazingViolet, and thanks for your good edits. Just something to look at...parking lots usually are drawn as an area, not a point. Here's the Wiki page about that: amenity=parking
|
| 83061517 | almost 6 years ago | Please add descriptive comments with your changesets. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
|
| 83061517 | almost 6 years ago | Please add descriptive comments with your changesets. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
|
| 81793099 | almost 6 years ago | Nice work!
|
| 82546525 | almost 6 years ago | This area looks more like trees than grass. What do you think? Please fix it. Thanks.
|
| 82574590 | almost 6 years ago | Using golf cartpaths zig-zagging through a parking lot for cars doesn't work. Please re-work this using parking aisles. Also using golf cartpaths for the athletic field is also incorrect so please fix this. If you are not sure of the correct tags please check the Wiki at: leisure=track
|
| 83002521 | almost 6 years ago | Please use changeset comments that give a better description of what you did and why. Good changeset comments are part of good practices for OSM editors. Please review this Wiki article: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
|
| 82161709 | almost 6 years ago | Please do not delete existing objects and then re-draw essentially the same objects. Instead edit the existing object so the editing history is preserved. Many of the objects you have re-drawn are only very slightly different from what was there before.
|