manuelab_telenav's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 38302525 | over 8 years ago | Hello, I saw you modified some road categories in Phoenix in this changeset, apart from adding speed limits. Could you tell me a reason why you think way/211370327 is a tertiary_link? From what i read on Wiki, the links should be used for slip roads/ramps (osm.wiki/Highway_link).
|
| 41167486 | over 8 years ago | Great! Thanks and keep on mapping :) |
| 41167486 | over 8 years ago | Hello, I was correcting errors caused by turn restrictions in OSM and i stumbled upon one that you added. I'm talking about relation id 6451285. I think this is wrong, because there is even a turn lane that indicates you can turn right. In the comment you wrote that you used Mapillar as source, but i cannot find any signs in the images. Could you please review this restriction again?
|
| 48426859 | over 8 years ago | Hello bdustan, Thanks for correcting this. I checked all available satellite imagery and none of them seemed to match the road as it is now. This is probably too recent. I reviewed the area again and i'm asking myself if the addr:interpolation ways are ok as they are now; they are following the road as it used to be. What do you think? |
| 47093244 | over 8 years ago | Hello,
|
| 47059409 | over 8 years ago | Thank you for your message. I have noticed this mistake I made after closing the changeset. Since then, I make smaller changesets with more descriptive comments. you can check them out here: http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changesets?display_name=manuelab_telenav |
| 20706190 | over 8 years ago | Hello Kevo, I am correcting street names in Toronto. I have a curiosity on the Kiss'n'Ride parkings. Do you think it's alright to keep the name tag on the ways like that? I have seen many throughout Toronto and it seems a bit weird to me, so I'm not really sure what to do with them.
|
| 46151739 | almost 9 years ago | Hello, I noticed you modified relation/6862308 to only_straight_on but you did not change the members of the relation. I know the sign says "only straight on" but this can be translated into "no right", "no left", "no u turn". So this relation was correct just as is was. If you don't like the "no ..." schema, at least change the members as well, when you change the type of the restriction. Thanks! |
| 44514501 | almost 9 years ago | Thank you a lot for correcting this! As I'm not a Canada citizen, these kind of confusion can happen sometimes. I'm doing my best trying to improve Canada in OSM, based on local data and OSC/Mapillary photos.
|