malcolmh's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 165140804 | 8 months ago | If you have verified that this is so, then go ahead. |
| 73990412 | about 1 year ago | You should contact the original mapper who made that tag. My change was only to the distance units tag |
| 128169930 | about 3 years ago | That looks like a fender. The correct tagging for that is seamark:type= shoreline_construction, seamark:shoreline_construction:category=fender. The attribute "surface" is for seabed type. |
| 126364314 | about 3 years ago | You can edit that! |
| 126364268 | about 3 years ago | Done |
| 124839824 | over 3 years ago | I don't have a Slack account! |
| 124839824 | over 3 years ago | How come the closed clearance height is greater than the open clearance height? |
| 108840685 | over 4 years ago | Perhaps your could share those thoughts with the rest of us? In particular, why did you change the "source=US NGA Pub. 114. 2011-05-26." tag on the light to "osm.wiki/Tag:source:seamark=..."? There are about 12000 other objects in the world with the tag that you changed. Should they also be changed, and if not, why is this object unique? |
| 98856868 | almost 5 years ago | Bernhard, The radius tagged is no longer used. Light sectors are now automatically rendered according to the zoom level, so as to maintain visibility of the sector arc on the screen. |
| 86917530 | about 5 years ago | Light ranges 200 Miles??!! |
| 88213308 | about 5 years ago | What exactly are the 3 ways tagged as buoys? They cannot be buoys as buoys are always on singular nodes |
| 88288230 | about 5 years ago | What exactly are these objects? They cannot be buoys, since buoys are always singular nodes. |
| 90471856 | over 5 years ago | These areas should have the tag: seamark:type=cable_area. cable_submarine is the tag for actual cables |
| 38485682 | about 6 years ago | What are these "Sea Rescue" objects? |
| 78129084 | about 6 years ago | What are the nodes "Sea Rescue"? I don't see any object on the satellite imagery. |
| 69204029 | over 6 years ago | You are correct. I edited this object blind, just responding to validation errors after mapping closeby objects. As it is just across the street from me, I will go and do a survey & make the necessary corrections. |
| 67229975 | almost 7 years ago | There are four substations. The 4th is on node/6273857077 |
| 59793583 | over 7 years ago | This and other changesets by the same user seem to be global mechanical edits. Were these discussed with the OSM community beforehand? |
| 46900064 | about 8 years ago | OK, I have removed those name tags entirely. In all cases the tag values were already present in other tags. |
| 46900064 | about 8 years ago | I removed the "seamark:" prefixes to those tags as they were not valid. If the resulting tags are incorrect, then please feel free to delete them. |