For the time being, i've decided to manually revert the reclassification of Allen from motorway -> primary until consensus changes

If anyone is willing to make a forum post and decision is made to reclassify Allen, we can do that

For the record, thank you for the contributions, but generally major re-classifications like this should go thru the forums first

Only noticed this change now. +1 with Jarek. The Allen Road is a motorway. It was built as one, it is called an expressway identical to the rest of the expressways in Ontario, and the City of Toronto calls it an expressway. It is classified the same as all other municipal expressways. https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/streets-parking-transportation/road-maintenance/bridges-and-expressways/expressways/allen-road/
https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/streets-parking-transportation/road-maintenance/bridges-and-expressways/expressways/. Wikipedia also lists it as an expressway. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipal_expressway I am not aware of anyone calling the Allen road anything but an expressway.

To your question of Hwy 7: Expressways are separate from historical highways. Hwy 7 is classified no differently than Hwy 10 AKA Hurontario-Main. They are considered primary roads. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ontario_provincial_highways

Fixed in changeset/170485203

Thanks for telling me! seriously unsure how i managed to do that mistake

Oops. Will fix

Fixed, thanks for telling me!

Alright. I've added it back in

Hey,

You deleted a road here and disconnected roads. Was that intentional? Does that road not exist?

Thanks! Did not know. Will fix my changesets.

Yeah, that would be better. I think the routing issue seems to be on the app's end, as it should be treating the platform as an area and not a way.

Hello,

You are making duplicate station platforms by turning the footways into platforms, is there a reason for that? The area is already marked as a platform.

Gouda 🧀

Bit silly of me. I dont know how i noticed.
Fixed it in 159667990, alongside stops (because i forgot about those as well). thanks for the notif!

I have undone the changeset and resimplified the creek with a lot less aggressive simplification.
Thanks for the feedback

Sorry about that. I got into the habit of simplifying all water bodies around here because 90% of them are over-noded... I may have gone overboard on the simplification aggressiveness. I'll turn it down for future bodies, and re-simplify this one.

I'll comment again when I manage to get around to it. Thanks for your input.

that was the wrong building LOL
whell this changeset is still valid

Forgot to mention in changeset- removed obviously wrong width=* values (5 lane road with width=7)

Whoops. This source should be Survey, not Bing. Sorry for future confusion.

Also- just a follow up, I would heavily recommend you check out osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines for future and past imports.

At the very least, Town of Milton is not a source added in osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue and I would heavily recommend adding your data to it.

Hey! Friendly reminder to double-check what you're importing.
You double-imported a great deal of buildings around eighth line that were already traced. I've reverted what I can in changeset/129622119, but for future and past commits please do double check to ensure you're not importing already existing info.
I'm not sure if this is the exact commit that created those double imports, but they were spread out across multiple of your changesets and I don't have them saved after I deleted the duplicates.

Forgot to mention- some of the buildings from the imports didn't exist according to aerial, and were removed.