Shouldn't the West Peak be labeled as either "Mount Olympus West Peak" or as simply "Mount Olympus" without the semicolon? Also, having the semicolon in the `ele` tag means that it doesn't get rendered on most maps.

I don't see your point. I'm not uploading a bulk import. For every building I visually check that it makes sense

Can you explain why this should be `natural=peak` and not `natural=volcano`?

Similar volcano-peaks like Mount Hood (node/357310459) and Mount Adams (node/356544063) are tagged as `natural=volcano`.

Just FYI, the only OSM GPS trace I see was presumably uploaded from the old USGS data. That's why the GPS trace overlaps perfectly with the line on the USGS topo map. I uploaded a new GPS trace and am trying to correct some of the way alignment.

Just FYI, Muir Trail Ranch previously existed as a `leisure=resort`: node/6636011693. Also, I believe this is best tagged as `tourism=alpine_hut`

See: tourism=alpine_hut
"An alpine hut is a remote building located in the mountains intended to provide board and lodging. It is managed during the opening period."

I don't think you need to add `name=campsite`; `tourism=camp_site` is enough

Passes, .e.g Pinchot and Mather should be tagged as `natural=saddle`, not `tourism=attraction`

I think it's unnecessary to add amenity=water_point each time the JMT crosses a stream; just setting the two to cross should be enough. After all, that tag is for "places where you can get larger amounts of "drinking water" for filling a fresh water holding tank, such as found on caravans, RVs and boats", which doesn't really apply here.

Is "Add AI features better"? I'm adding tons of usually buildings generated from mapwith.ai, but since I can only do 50 at a time I have to write hundreds of commit messages, and I'm not going to write something purely custom after adding 49 buildings and one road. Shouldn't it be enough to see sources, imagery used, and the editor used?

The trail caught my eye because I'd never heard of/seen a trail there. I looked at the high-res Strava, and it looks like part of that path might have been traveled once or twice ever, but it's definitely not heavy and consistent. https://i.imgur.com/WBXUjDf.jpg

I'm on the newer side to OSM... I'm unclear how defined the Strava heatmap needs to be to make something a trail. For example, if someone goes on an off-trail hike and uploads that to Strava, that presumably shouldn't be included? This way also isn't on original USGS topo maps, either.

I used these procedures for getting high-res strava into JOSM:
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/62803/strava-heatmap-no-longer-useful-for-osm-mappers-anything-we-can-do?page=1&focusedAnswerId=62842#62842

@tomthepom do you have any references for this line? It's not an official trail from the National Park Service's trails dataset: https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2220516