Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the genuine miss by our editor for not using best aligned imagery to edit. Thank you once again.
Regards,
kumarxeq

PS: Replying on behalf, as our editor is no longer a part our organization

Hey Rainero,
Apologies for the genuine mistake made by our editor. Thank you so much for reviewing the changeset & correcting the edit. He might have mistakenly added a service road here. Thank you once again.
Regards,
Kumarxeq

PS: Replying on behalf, as our editor is no longer a part our organization.

Hi VictorIE,
Our sincere apologies for the incorrect edit made by our editor. I have now deleted incorrect footpaths as they are not present in any of the latest imagery. (changes made with changeset: 115244599).

Thanks for bringing this up to our notice and please let us know if there is any further issue.
Regards,
kumarxeq.

PS: Replying on behalf of our editor, as the editor is no longer a part of our organization.

Hello,
Thanks for correcting the edit. Apologies for the genuine miss. Our editor might have missed checking best aligned imagery to make the edit.
Best Regards,
kumarxeq.

PS: Replying on behalf, as our editor is no longer a part of our organization.

Hi SafetyIng,
Very sorry for the inconvenience. I have now modified the highway tag to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107293445) with suggested modifications. Happy to learn from you. Good day!
Regards,
kumarxeq

Hi Safetying,
Apologies for the misinterpretation of the road class here. I have now added service=driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107097955) with modifications.
Regards,
kumarxeq

Hello,
Thanks for looking into my edits. Sorry for the inconvenience. I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as per your suggestion. Happy to learn from the community. Regards,
kumarxeq

Hello,
Thanks for the response. I have added the service road as I am not aware of the type of entity. I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as per your suggestion. Happy to learn from you. Have a good day!
Regards,
kumarxeq

Hi PT-53,
Sorry for the genuine miss from my end. I have now added service=driveway as per your suggestion. Thanks for looking into my edits. Happy to learn from you. Good day!
Regards,
kumarxeq

Hi,
Thanks for checking my edit. I have added service road as the entity type cannot be identified from available OSM resources. I have modified it to driveway based on your feedback(Changeset: 104580801). Always happy to learn from community.
Regards,
kumarxeq

Hi,
Thanks for checking into our edits and making the necessary corrections. I missed on adding the railway crossing as I it was not clearly visible from aerial view. I will take this as a learning from the community and implement in my future edits. Always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
kumarxeq.

Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have overlooked the imagery and added the track. Thanks for the improvisation. i will make sure to follow your suggestions in my future edits. Always happy to learn from the community

Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the edits based the available imagery.
It is good to see the community improvising our edits. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to follow in my future edits. Always happy to learn from the community

Thanks for your suggestions. I will make sure to implement it in my future edits. Always happy to learn from the community

thanks for your response. we are using the aerial view and available osm resources to make the edits. in this case, we didn’t have any other valid source to add the access information. To maintain the editing quality and avoid the wrong flow of information into osm, we have restricted our edit to just add basic road based on the available osm resources. But given a feedback from local community members, we immediately take it up and add access information. Please do let us know if there is any other possible way to identify the access information from the available resources of OSM, happy to learn about this and implement in my editing.

Thanks for checking into our edits. we are making the edits based on the osm resources. The imagery used can be identified from the osm changeset. We are adding the driveways to the roads leading to single entities as per the wiki. Since the road is leading to multiple entites, we are not sure of the highway tag, now changing the road to driveway as per your suggestions. Please let me know in case of any more modifications. Always happy to learn from the community