OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
40157390 over 3 years ago

Hah it's been a while so I definitely don't remember! But I'm guessing I assumed it's a service road / driveway because it appears to be inside a fenced area. Maybe some kind of community center or part of the park? I'd be pretty surprised if it was actually signed as West Ave, but I don't have any source to confirm.

70145029 over 6 years ago

Haha I'll do my best :)

67570178 almost 7 years ago

Oops. Those are from the city's address database I'm referencing. I'll take care of them.

Thanks!

65421234 about 7 years ago

Hey, thanks again for contributing! I went ahead and tagged this as a swimming pool. Not sure why you wouldn't be able to see that tag in the editor. It's appearing OK for me.

Let me know if there is any way I can help.

63756191 about 7 years ago

This is a drain, not a street

63597065 about 7 years ago

These sidewalks were all very short, disconnected segments that weren't routable at all. I just moved them onto the streets using the other tagging scheme mentioned on that page. It's quite a bit easier to maintain that way. All the data is still there.

60198369 over 7 years ago

I think the green space along Regent Drive is a little small to tag as a park. Usually a park has some recreation features in it, like pitches, picnic tables, shelters, etc. Tagging them as landuse=grass or something might be more appropriate.

And welcome to OSM! Thanks for all the great edits.

60083538 over 7 years ago

Are you sure there is a cemetery there? It looks like someone's front yard.

59057398 over 7 years ago

Teodora,

I prefer to map links as the lower class because the road topology makes more sense when you start excluding lower classes of roads. For example, at low zoom levels where some road classes are excluded, you can end up with links that go to nowhere if you map them as the higher class. So I map them as the lower class to keep things cleaner.

FWIW that wiki page is mark as disputed. Could probably use some revision to explain there are different approaches.

The links are currently consistently mapped to the lower class in San Antonio. I'd prefer to keep them mapped that way. I guess it shouldn't affect routing though, so ultimately it's just aesthetics.

Chris

58380799 over 7 years ago

hi

P.S. Hit b in the editor and switch to Texas Orthophoto or Mapbox Satellite for newer imagery

51723831 over 8 years ago

Fixed. Thanks!

51137249 over 8 years ago

Afraid I have a keybind for highway=turning_circle that's easy to accidentally press. I cleaned these up. Thanks for the heads up!

45850681 almost 9 years ago

Oops. Should be better now. Thanks for pointing it out!

35066218 about 10 years ago

OK, that sounds good. I'm not opposed to using SH, I'd just like to have some consensus on it and for it to be used consistently across the state.

35066218 about 10 years ago

Please stop changing TX to SH. I know it's not consistent with what TxDOT uses, but TX is the accepted format in OSM. osm.wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#Texas