konstantink_lyft's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 165397716 | 6 months ago | Hi, Baloo Uriza, My name is Konstantin, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Yes, you’re absolutely right. Thank you very much for bringing the incorrect edits to our attention and for removing inappropriate access. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my edits. Best regards, Konstantin |
| 162605097 | 11 months ago | Hi, cubbe8! My name is Konstantin, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out. I understand your concern about the road being public. However, my recent updates were based on our ground truth imagery:
According to OSM policy access=*#:~:text=destination-,Only,-when%20travelling%20to, the access=destination tag is appropriate for roads where travel is restricted to local traffic only, as indicated by signs like "no thru traffic" or "local traffic only" in the USA. This tag does not imply that the road is private, but rather that it is intended for destination traffic only, not through traffic. Lyft OSM mapping team strive to ensure the map edits are aligned with the guidelines and appreciate your understanding. We welcome any additional insights you may have. Best regards,
|
| 161207102 | 12 months ago | Hi, StreetSurveyor!
Thank you for reaching out. I have added access=private tag according to “Private Road. No Thru Traffic” sign on our ground truth imagery 2024-04-10: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NSW65CBhqEvxNQPmXPEeTqm-b9_BIc8_/view?usp=sharing, located 42.35071, -71.06502.
Best regards, Konstantin. |
| 159892875 | about 1 year ago | Hi, lessiopi!
Thank you for highlighting this issue. I apologize for not transferring the relevant tags to the remaining way. I have added the name tag in the changeset (changeset/159912064). Best regards, Konstantin |