keithonearth's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 43089272 | about 9 years ago | Hi wentworth4, thanks for your edits. From what I've seen they are good. Also, I was wondering if you'd be willing to leave more meaningful edit summaries. For example "adding address". Or "retagging bus_stop as bus_station" which is, as best as I can figure, what this edit did. I think it'd be helpful if you used more informative edit summaries. |
| 43225677 | about 9 years ago | I forgot to update the source field in JOSM. I did not use Bing imagery here, as it is useless for this area. I used Mapbox. It is far better quality for this area. |
| 39965987 | about 9 years ago | 对不起,我不会说中国话 This edit seems to have some errors. 阳关中路 was duplicated, and a new road was added on top of the old road, with a name tag, instead of the name being added to original road. Also the name=* tag should contain Chinese, not "Chinese (and English)". Take a look at http://learnosm.org/zh/ for more info on mapping. |
| 42876490 | about 9 years ago | The construction of the new road and bridge is visible on the Bing imagery. |
| 42841141 | about 9 years ago | This monastery has been one of the most important within Tibetan Buddhism, the town it is located in is of little importance. People often use the name of the Monastery to refer to the town as a whole, as it is more well known. The tagging of the two was a mess, with some of the name:lang tags referring on the town node referring to the correct name for the town, others referring to the monastery. I've fixed the tags so all the tags on the monastery refer to the monastery, and all the tags on the town refer to the town. I also added it to the county relation, as it is the administrative seat of the county. |
| 42339522 | about 9 years ago | Hi SomeoneElse. I have a hard time believing these edits are not vandalism. Did you see my edit (changeset/42477487) that removed one of their caravan sites that had been placed in the middle of an airport taxiway? While I did not survey that location in person, it is a most unlikely location for a caravan site. Locations that I did visit in person had caravan sites, or other POIs, added by this user that were non-existent in reality. I'm not saying that more action needs to be taken at this time, but I do think we should keep a close eye on this editor. |
| 42339522 | about 9 years ago | I reverted their edits as I came across nodes with Thai names. I was not methodical in making sure I got all of this users edits fixed, so I would think that there is still clean up to do. Thanks for the heads-up about the user being blocked, I'm glad to hear that happened. |
| 22325209 | about 9 years ago | There's a note (note/183932) that discusses the buildings that you've tagged as commercial close to the bridge. There's confusion, because they look like ruins in the imagery you've used for this edit. |
| 42642496 | about 9 years ago | I don't normally delete things that are not in the imagery, but in this case the track had the same name tag as the highway. This "highway" was unpaved until recently, and I think this is a fragment of the original mapping. |
| 36657453 | about 9 years ago | This changeset seems to have been reverted also. I didn't do the main reversion, but cleaned up the last remaining nodes. The issues are the same as the others, disconnected nodes with only a name tag, that means meaningful information. Additionally, I would point out that this edit did not take place in or around Shimla, as the edit summery states. Or even in HP. It was almost entirely in J&K, the next state over. |
| 36395111 | about 9 years ago | I've reverted this changeset, due to the same issues as the others. (many disconnected nodes, with meaningless tags) |
| 36395107 | about 9 years ago | I've reverted this changeset, due to the same issues as the others. (many disconnected nodes, with meaningless tags) |
| 36395059 | about 9 years ago | I've reverted this changeset, due to the same issues as the others (it consists of many disconnected nodes with meaningless names) |
| 36395071 | about 9 years ago | I've reverted this changeset, as I am unable to find anything constructive in it. Please feel free to ask me any questions if you have any. |
| 36395095 | about 9 years ago | I've reverted this changeset. It consists of a large number of disconnected nodes, that are tagged in a way that has no meaning in the OSM context, nor am I able to interpret them. |
| 42441119 | about 9 years ago | Please let us know where you are getting all these oddly located caravan sites. A number of them locations that I was familiar with did not have the caravan sites that you mapped. As I am no longer in India I can not check any more locations, but I have a hard time believing that there is a caravan site in the middle of this airport taxiway. Additionally, as I've said before, Thai is not an appropriate language for name tags in India. As such I am reverting your edit. |
| 42205143 | about 9 years ago | Sorry not to leave more time after your comment upendrakarukonda, but I've contacted this user in the past about errors (often carivan_site nodes), and not received a reply. I've now reverted this changeset, as it contains a number of identifiable errors, and inexplicably uses Thai language for the name tags, and duplicates already mapped things, with incorrect tags. Chalit, I do not mean to cause offence, or discourage you from contributing to OSM. However, for your edits to be constructive some improvements are necessary. http://learnosm.org/en/ is a great resource, but is unfortunately not available in Thai at this time. |
| 42315186 | about 9 years ago | I've reverted this edit, as I have been to the location of the caravan site, and there is not one in this location. Thai language is not appropriate for use in name tags in India. While I do not know that the other additions are inaccurate, I do not feel that the edit is reliable. |
| 36395080 | about 9 years ago | I'd be interested to hear abou the meaning of your edit, and the process you used to come up with these nodes in either way. |
| 36395051 | about 9 years ago | I'm sorry to have to inform you that I have reverted this changeset. I have not been able to find any nodes that are correctly tagged in it. The majority of the nodes are just name=`xxx`, with `xxx` being a 3 digit number. The odd node has name=`note`, with `note` being a some sort of description of road conditions or an amenity. Some of these nodes would have been useful uploaded as notes (you can add these using the speech bubble icon on the right hand side of the main website, seehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes for more info). It should be pointed out that we do not map if a road is "crowded" or not, because this changes with time of day, etc, and we only map permanent things. Also see http://learnosm.org/en/ to get a better idea of how mapping on OSM works. |