I forgot to update the source field, it should be "survey".

This building (way/160290132) also contained an error, should have been 3 addresses, not one. I've fixed it.

This edit contains at least one error, this (way/309854489) building contained one address, when in fact it has 3 separate addresses. I've fixed it by moving the addresses to nodes.

Thanks for updating the node.

Another error in the address added to this building:

way/291869937

There are multiple addresses to this building, and they are already added to the nodes of the business's.

I mistakenly forgot to update Josm's source tag. I should have said "local knowledge"

Two more buildings with addressing errors in this changeset:

way/536535030

way/309857585

Thanks for seeing my note and changing the name of the plaza. To tell the truth I'd forgotten all about it.

Additionally a building (way/331422458) had an address tagged on the building outline, but in fact the building contained at least two addresses. I've fixed it, after doing a site survey.

I don't mean to give you a hard time, but this changeset also contains at least one error, with a single address for a building (way/309857586) that has multiple (at least 5) addresses. I've fixed it.

This one (way/160289773) too.

This edit also contains bad data, one building (way/309666268) that has multiple addresses, has only been tagged with one. I'll fix it.

This is another changeset, that contains bad data, in this case two buildings with the same address. One (way/309666268) was numbered 901, but a survey proved the correct address to be 909. I've fixed it, but it's all too common to find bad address data in your changesets.

Also, it'd be good to know the source of this data.

Unusual for Nepal, that is. The forest traces here are generally very well done, far better than India.

This looks like the name of a school, but is on a road. Can you please clarify if it is the name of a school or a road.

I'm wondering what the "Ezhammile Edakkad Thengamam Pazhakulam Road" (way/359734078) is based on. It is absent from the Bing and Esri imagery, and a note says it is absent from DGP images too. There is no GPS data available.

I'm putting up a note (note/1597839) recommending it be deleted, if more information is not available.

My edit 5 months ago seems to have mistakenly left two unclosed ways as part of the relation that contains pretty much all the wooded areas of North Pender. I think it had been rendering after that edit, but due to a technical change no longer was editing. My mistake caused no forests on N Pender to render. Sorry!

I think I've fixed the issue with this edit.

here (way/259486983/history) is an example of another building that contains multiple addresses, but only had one placed on the outline. I have not found any examples yet of any buildings with two or more addresses that you've done anything other than just put one address on the building outline.

This is an error, and one that is hard to find, so hard to fix.

Thanks for catching and fixing that.

This edit added a single addresses to many buildings. I think it is worth pointing out that most of the buildings had multiple addresses. I've fixed it for some of the buildings, but have yet to check the other buildings. In the case of one building it was just the wrong address.

As I've said before, it is good to provide us with the source for your addresses, as it allows us to be better informed as to the validity of the data.