OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
146266133 almost 2 years ago

Thanks for noticing my note, and updating to a construction site.

141044147 almost 2 years ago

I'm not sure what you mean by "Protected bike lane is part of the roadway", just like the sidewalk, it is part of the public thoroughfare, but it has a barrier between it, and the lanes for general traffic.

Yes, it is a short section of separated cycleway, but I believe it meets the criteria to be mapped as its own way.

145257778 almost 2 years ago

Was this an automated edit?

53382514 about 2 years ago

This changeset also contains at least two address errors, which I've fixed.

48049095 about 2 years ago

Thanks for your edit! Your edit from 6 years ago made it much easier for me to find this hostel!

142588387 about 2 years ago

The map looks nice with those trees!

28366272 about 2 years ago

Thanks for getting back to me!

I was referring to the lack of address nodes, or houses/buildings contained in the relation. It's a relation for mapping addresses, but contained no addresses, just the street.

But I had not checked the full history, so it would make sense that you'd done it correctly to start with, but everything had been deleted over the years, except a short section of Broadway itself, making the relation no longer match its purpose. It was a Josm error message about this that drew my attention.

It certainly seems like the `addr:*` scheme has become the favoured convention, so I think my deletion of the relation should remain. Do you agree?

28366272 about 2 years ago

I've deleted the AssociatedStreet relation that this changeset added, as its addition was unexplained, does not match how the wiki says this tag should be used, and it looks like an error. Let me know if I am mistaken, and I can revert my edit.

Relation: relation/4513471/history

My changeset: changeset/142366737

141841547 about 2 years ago

I did record my route on my phone's gps twice when riding on this path, but the resulting gpx files were pretty inaccurate, so I disregarded them when adding the path, for the most part. The cycleway's accuracy could be improved when imagery becomes available, or someone else wants to try to get a better gps trace.

116765473 over 2 years ago

All of their changesets use the summery "all". At least they do not seem to be active any more.

116746963 over 2 years ago

This edit added a bilingual (French + English) to a short section of street in Vancouver. This is non standard for Vancouver, so I've changed it back to a purely English name (changeset/141138575). If you want to add French names to Vancouver streets use the `name:fr` key.

140513279 over 2 years ago

Thanks for working on the map and being receptive!

124655918 over 2 years ago

Today I just heard about the Zoji La tunnel project. Thanks for adding it to the map!

139409910 over 2 years ago

I think this was added as a AirBnB type rental, and as such isn't really applicable, or useful, in the OSM database.

85968474 over 2 years ago

Hi, two of these three campsites are located in the middle of the highway, and are not visible in the imagery. The third one is also not visible in the imagery. Are they real? What did you base this edit on Osmch2?

124250899 over 2 years ago

I've deleted the highway=cycleway on Fourth that this edit added, because ways tagged as highway=cycleway are best used for dedicated bicycle paths, or paths shared with pedestrians. Fourth just has a painted bike lane, between the parking land for cars, and the travel lane for cars. In this case it's best to use tags on the road itself (cycleway=lane, or similar) to indicate the presence of a bike lane, which was already done.

No disrespect intended, and I hope you continue to contribute to OSM.

135213326 over 2 years ago

From the North this construction area just looks like a abandoned building, but from the alley you can see that a new construction is almost finished. I think the facade facing Broadway was saved, and a new building was built behind it.

53307762 over 2 years ago

I haven't commented on this changeset, but it also has an address error too. This (way/357092568) building has two addresses on it, not one as this changeset added. Please add a source for your edits.

53543347 almost 3 years ago

I've not commented on this changeset, so I'll just point out that I found an error in this one too, after surveying the addresses. This building: way/292766817

53252366 almost 3 years ago

I've fixed the address on one building added in this changeset. As I've not said it on this changeset: you should add a source for your edits.