keithonearth's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 28366272 | about 2 years ago | Thanks for getting back to me! I was referring to the lack of address nodes, or houses/buildings contained in the relation. It's a relation for mapping addresses, but contained no addresses, just the street. But I had not checked the full history, so it would make sense that you'd done it correctly to start with, but everything had been deleted over the years, except a short section of Broadway itself, making the relation no longer match its purpose. It was a Josm error message about this that drew my attention. It certainly seems like the `addr:*` scheme has become the favoured convention, so I think my deletion of the relation should remain. Do you agree? |
| 28366272 | about 2 years ago | I've deleted the AssociatedStreet relation that this changeset added, as its addition was unexplained, does not match how the wiki says this tag should be used, and it looks like an error. Let me know if I am mistaken, and I can revert my edit. Relation: relation/4513471/history My changeset: changeset/142366737 |
| 141841547 | about 2 years ago | I did record my route on my phone's gps twice when riding on this path, but the resulting gpx files were pretty inaccurate, so I disregarded them when adding the path, for the most part. The cycleway's accuracy could be improved when imagery becomes available, or someone else wants to try to get a better gps trace. |
| 116765473 | over 2 years ago | All of their changesets use the summery "all". At least they do not seem to be active any more. |
| 116746963 | over 2 years ago | This edit added a bilingual (French + English) to a short section of street in Vancouver. This is non standard for Vancouver, so I've changed it back to a purely English name (changeset/141138575). If you want to add French names to Vancouver streets use the `name:fr` key. |
| 140513279 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for working on the map and being receptive! |
| 124655918 | over 2 years ago | Today I just heard about the Zoji La tunnel project. Thanks for adding it to the map! |
| 139409910 | over 2 years ago | I think this was added as a AirBnB type rental, and as such isn't really applicable, or useful, in the OSM database. |
| 85968474 | over 2 years ago | Hi, two of these three campsites are located in the middle of the highway, and are not visible in the imagery. The third one is also not visible in the imagery. Are they real? What did you base this edit on Osmch2? |
| 124250899 | over 2 years ago | I've deleted the highway=cycleway on Fourth that this edit added, because ways tagged as highway=cycleway are best used for dedicated bicycle paths, or paths shared with pedestrians. Fourth just has a painted bike lane, between the parking land for cars, and the travel lane for cars. In this case it's best to use tags on the road itself (cycleway=lane, or similar) to indicate the presence of a bike lane, which was already done. No disrespect intended, and I hope you continue to contribute to OSM. |
| 135213326 | over 2 years ago | From the North this construction area just looks like a abandoned building, but from the alley you can see that a new construction is almost finished. I think the facade facing Broadway was saved, and a new building was built behind it. |
| 53307762 | over 2 years ago | I haven't commented on this changeset, but it also has an address error too. This (way/357092568) building has two addresses on it, not one as this changeset added. Please add a source for your edits. |
| 53543347 | almost 3 years ago | I've not commented on this changeset, so I'll just point out that I found an error in this one too, after surveying the addresses. This building: way/292766817 |
| 53252366 | almost 3 years ago | I've fixed the address on one building added in this changeset. As I've not said it on this changeset: you should add a source for your edits. |
| 123211777 | almost 3 years ago | Are the `highway=cycleway` you added to Fourth separated bike paths, or dedicated lanes painted on the roadway? |
| 111798775 | almost 3 years ago | Thanks. That's interesting. Some indoor mapping is good, but I don't think that there's a reasonable way to map what sounds like it's just a very unusual basement. Odd that they had this plan in the first place, it seems like an odd location, although I guess it's just over 100m away. |
| 111798775 | almost 3 years ago | How up to date is the info on the subway entrance at the current Whole Foods location? I don't remember my source (Proper news, YouTube videos?), but I was under the impression that the current Broadway-City Hall entrance was going to be the only one. Should we delete the construction at whole foods? |
| 128960570 | about 3 years ago | I'm sorry to see them go, but thanks for updating the map. |
| 72791681 | about 3 years ago | I'm deleting the address tags from the small building that had a house number of 900 added by this edit, as I visited, and found this house number wrong. |
| 127923007 | about 3 years ago | Thank you for noticing and fixing this so quickly! Unfortunately this user is still active, their last edit was a few hours ago. |