I'm sorry to do this again, but I've not gotten any clarification on why you're adding Thai language name (and name:hi) tags to places in India, so I've reverted this edit.

I can't say definitively that any of these tags are inaccurate, but that camp-site looks pretty unlikely in the Bing imagery (more like a parking lot), and I have seen some nodes uploaded by you that definitely do not reflect the situation on the ground.

Please clarify what's going on with your edits.

The route with less switchbacks is the main road now, what had been tagged as the NH3 is an old fragment of it that is the unfavoured route, is very rough and very steep. I mistakenly took it, to my regret.

This also seems to be a bunch of nodes that have been erroneously uploaded. They seem to refer to directions provided by a GPS devise for someone's trip at some point. Also this is not in HP, as the summery states.

All of the nodes added by this edit contain only name tags, with no other tags. The name tags make no sense, eg "name=522 - STRAIGHT AT JUNCTION",or just "name=512".

Because of this I reverted this edit, with the changeset: changeset/41354365

Please see: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/50049 for more info on this edit.

Porpoise Bay Park was divided up into 4 blocks, with the road dividing it east/west, and an additional north south divide that did not seem to be for any reason, or correspond with any physical feature. Nor is it shown on other maps. As such I have joined the north sections with the south sections. Now the road divides the park into two sections, as with many other parks with a road through them.

As some of the same lines were used for park boundary and Sechelt City boundary this edit effected that as well, but no changes were made to the boundary demarcation.

Thanks! That's a nice restaurant.

Oops, this was a Bing trace, not the strava data.

I'd like to add a bit more info on my paper maps I mentioned in the edit summery source tag.

I have 5 paper maps that have this town noted on it, from 4 publishers. These maps are from China, the UK, and the Tibetan refugees in India. All the maps note either 安多, ཨ་མདོ, or Amdo (ie, all variations on the same thing), as the prominent name. I can provide more info if needed.

I provided the wrong source in the changeset tags. I forgot to update it in JOSM. The correct source is Bing.

Well, I have no idea why, but after my meaningless edit, and refreshing my browser, the buildings all showed up. Most odd. I hope I didn't make a mistake when I first added them...

I mistakenly forgot to update the source tag. I used Bing imagery for this edit, not BC Mosaic.

Once again I forgot to change the Source field in Josm. This actually used BC Mosaic, and not Bing, as a source.

oops, I forgot to update the source field, this edit was just a Bing trace. Only my last edit was from wikipedia.

I wouldn't normally make such major changes to a trail w/o surveying it, but there was enough information contradicting the version mapped, that I felt it appropriate to change it. The main thing was there was far more river crossings than I did while taking this trail, and that river is big enough that any crossings are a major undertaking.

Thanks for the complement PlaneMad! I appreciate it very much, especially coming from a professional like you.

This edit removed all tags from Issyk Kul (Lake) except the name, that was changed to name=тер-я школа (Ter-ya School). This prevented the 182km lake from rendering. This was a big mistake. At first I thought it was vandalism, but the other things that this edit did seemed to be improvements, so I think it was a mistake.

Google Translate: Я извиняюсь, если мой английский является сложной, пожалуйста, свяжитесь со мной, если вы хотите, чтобы я еще раз пояснить.

I don't know if anyone reads the notes here, but my edit summary was wrong, as I forgot to update it after my previous summary.

This time I was, in fact, adding farmland and wooded areas.

Damn it, forgot to change the edit summery in JOSM. Not streams, just the main building in the Gompa.

I've re-tagged the area tagged as meadow, to farmland, as the it is clearly terraced, and only land worked as farmland is terraced in Ladakh. Due to the time of year the Bing Imagery was taken it was at times difficult the exact boundary, however I'm confident that it's an improvement.