Hi ikopanjirukmana, Thank you for your suggestions and I agree with you. I would like to revise my edits here and I'll digitize individual buildings. Happy Mapping!

Hi Riyadi IRM-ED,
Trust you are doing great & Thanks for sharing the conflict issue with us. I have verified the changeset and data looks fine.
Thanks,
kaje001

Hi AkuAnakTimur ,
Hope you are doing well.
Thanks for reviewing this data , I have reverted the edits as per comment. we will make sure that not to change any classifications that are modified recently.

Hi RunRunShow,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Sibu, I have come across the way/689315445
way/689198078
way/689316474
classified as 'road'.

Please look into this and share your suggestion for the above ways which classification needs to be assigned.

Thanks in advance.

Hi RunRunShow,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Sibu, I have come across the way/689202517
way/565857273
way/565857284
way/689323889
way/689327482

node/6466552879
node/6466571596
node/6466585424
node/6466552883

classified as 'tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'unclassified'.

For way/689322060 , way/689326618 and way/689326619 classified as 'track and unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'service'.

and for way/689327490 , way/689328127 and way/689328557 classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance.