"Hi adiputra986,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the

node/6028744453
way/674625410

classified as ""track"". However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential' also way/639872666 is classified as ""unclassified"" whereas going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."

"Hi Adiatma IRM-RV,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the

way/676452080
way/676452075
way/676452074

classified as 'secondary""'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'tertiary'.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."

Hi Catursp,

Trust you are well, while working on Surabaya we came across way/585021966, which is not supported by any of the satellite image.Please share your inputs.

Thanks in advance.

"""Hi katpatuka,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way/49923330 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to a residential area .

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."""

"Hi ceyockey,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, came across
""way/168946667
way/162281876
way/168946247
way/168945780"" classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery this seems to be 'residential'

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."

Hi mueschel,

Thanks for the feedback.

corrections are done. Will ensure such typo errors are not repeated moving forward.

Thanks,
jyo.