Odpoved od riaditela internatu, ktory spravuje prislusne cesty, je tak vseobecna, ze som sa nic nedozvedel.

Ano, oficialne, vsetky tie service ways v areali maju mat vehicle=private, z oboch stran je znacka zakaz vjazdu vsetkym vozidlam (z druhej strany cesty nie je ani zavora). Pochybujem vsak, ze by niekto riesil bicykle alebo kolobezky, aj ked ich bude/nebude viest student. Pokusim sa iniciovat zmenu znacky (nepravdepodobne, ze by sa zmenila) alebo zistit, ci nie je vseobecne povolenie pre bicykle.

Kedysi to bola urcite telocvicna.

A, B, C a D su oznacenia blokov a ludia to bezne pisu do adries, aby to bolo jednoznacnejsie, kedze AB a CD su samostatne budovy so samostatnymi vchodmi. Neviem, ci chceme oficialnu presnost alebo beznu jednoznacnost. V tomto pripade sa este oznacuju aj jednotlive schodiska napr. A1 az A4. Pokial viem, v registri adries su aj jednotlive byty.

Znacka je az par metrov za branou, cez branu je mozne prejst bicyklom - je tam dostatocna medzera. Kedze ide o verejny priestor internatu, znacka nie je uplne vhodne zvolena (ako dalsie tisice podobnych znaciek na Slovensku).

Este stale tam maju v kontaktoch Marketingové oddelenie
marketing@tatrastower.sk

Dakujem za aktualizaciu. Prevadzkovatel zjavne presunul svoj portal na novu domenu (vyzera rovnako ako povodny).
https://web.archive.org/web/20210303052711/https://tatrastower.com/

V poriadku, staci adresa na budove.

Nezda sa mi ta oprava. Obchod si kvoli pandemii a setreniu presunul zasoby do objektu, ktory ani nema orientacne cislo, iba supisne. Pravdepodobne iba na nejaky cas, lebo povodne miesto, aj ked vyprazdnene, ma stale napisy ako predtym. Obchod teraz funguje iba ako vydajna po predchadzajucej dohode (objekt nema okna). Po Vasej oprave tam vsak teraz nie je ziadna adresa.

Dakujem za upozornenie. Neviem, co sa tam stalo, ja som menil iba tag motor_vehicle permit->private. Opravil som zmenu gate->station naspat na gate.

Suhlasim, podla definicie tam ma byt private. Skontrolujem aj ostatne tagy access, ktore som robil.

Thank you. I made changes to all parking lots in this zone.

OK.

Sorry. I merged pedestrian crossings paths together and separated crossing of pedestrians from cyclists so that I could direct cycleway crossing besides pedestrian crossing (from Trencianska to Dulovo nam.) as it is in reality and then cycleway on the right of road. But as cycleway lane is tagged on road with all information (except maybe width) and also there is tag cycleway=crossing on that pedestrian crossing node it seems now unnecessary. However in wiki Tag:cycleway=crossing they say it should not be used on nodes. And wiki Tag:footway=crossing shows completely different approach for combined foot and cycle crossing. In this particular case maybe it should stay as it is and crossing of bicycles with cars should be deduced by osmand somehow from cycleway connecting node from which cycle lane is emerging on the right.
Sorry again.

OK, I see now. Maybe I thought of foot path as small embankment. But you are right pedestrians do not care. I will read more carefully wiki and think. For Tag:traffic_calming=table they say it can be used on paths. But then Osmand would need to read tags of all crossing paths instead of nodes only. Thank you for clarification.

In this case there are both used. And I think it doesn't make sense to split short line into 3 segments.

OK. I understand now what you mean. I understand now why you don't like 'marked'. It's so easy with 'marked' to not to think of crossing in context of traffic-light-controlled crossroad. Yes, it's problem of web editor not to highlight context.

OK

Thanks.

It seems to me OK now. Maybe I had different understanding of lanes tag, somewhat similar to destination. Thank you for keeping OSM consistent.