My bad, thanks for fixing the typo!

Ah that makes sense, thanks!

I think the opening hours on their website are not up to date, but they are a bit more complex than I had indicated.

Fishback Ridgewood is a distinct business that operates out of Ridgewood Pork Store. Technically, Fridays noon to 5:00 p.m. are their walk-in hours. However, you can also place orders in advance and pick it up Saturdays at the Ridgewood Pork Store.

Perhaps there’s a better way of tagging that?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148707595

Done, thanks!

That makes sense. Is it possible to recreate the node and maintain its history?

Hello! I was going to retain the node but the JOSM data validator gave me a “Duplicate house numbers” warning because the building itself has the same address information. Should I ignore this warning in situations like this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147579714

My bad, I probably should have kept the node instead of creating a new node for the neighboring business. In this case, the business at 15-78 Gates actually spans across 15-76 Gates as well. Is there a way to make that information clearer?

*Add missing postbox

Ah, I didn’t know about that, thanks!

The business has indeed retained their name despite moving to a new address. I have personally been to the new location and talked to the owner.

Corrected.

I added the name as inscribed, but will correct.

Good question, I visited the delis to get their new phone numbers and updated them

There’s more agreement for `food_sharing` than for the `food_share`, so I don’t undersand what the problem is. Do you have a suggestion for how this should have been edited differently?

Hi MxxCon!

I don’t believe I made any changes to the name tag (I just left it as is).

As for `amenity=food_sharing`, I replaced `food_share` with `food_sharing` because no other nodes use the former. Also, It seems okay to use a tag that is currently proposed per
osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like.