OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
100004414

I'm having trouble finding the origin of the name for this peak. Do you know how it was derived?

156373814

Is this way meant to be golfcart path? way/1314230104

It seems the detached sidewalks along the residential roads in this development have been incorrectly tagged as golf cart paths.

156324415

Fixed: changeset/156870699

156779717

Fixed: changeset/156870651

156693342

Fixed with: changeset/156870567
Thanks!

155906277

Fixed! changeset/156237818

155787497

Fixed. Thanks!

155298768

Thanks for catching this. I believe this is fixed by changeset/155332582. I thought I fixed this waterway relation and used a grouping to convert the areas to lines for a multipolygon relation, but I missed the duplicate relation that was created as I did this. Thanks!

155160417

I fixed Two Lakes in changeset/155332198. I fixed Twin Lakes in changeset/155332350.

155160417

Thanks for helping me correct this. I realized yesterday after working on the other changeset you commented on for Beaverhead River that I did this incorrectly. I believe this is now fixed correctly with changeset/155331798.

154543248

I believe I got this fixed. Can you double check this? Thanks!
changeset/154608699

154152926

I added these in and wasn't sure it was the correct way to do it. But there are a couple attached multi-use paths that are signed, but are often blocked by garbage bins and parked cars. I thought it would be helpful to mark these separately since they are two-way multi-use paths.

154239099

I wasn't aware of that naming convention. I can change these. The numbers are part of the trail name, and on many published maps these are referred to be number only. Do you still think it should be moved to ref?