jtrull's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 100004414 | I'm having trouble finding the origin of the name for this peak. Do you know how it was derived? |
|
| 156373814 | Is this way meant to be golfcart path? way/1314230104 It seems the detached sidewalks along the residential roads in this development have been incorrectly tagged as golf cart paths. |
|
| 156324415 | Fixed: changeset/156870699 |
|
| 156779717 | Fixed: changeset/156870651 |
|
| 156693342 | Fixed with: changeset/156870567
|
|
| 155906277 | Fixed! changeset/156237818 |
|
| 155787497 | Fixed. Thanks! |
|
| 155298768 | Thanks for catching this. I believe this is fixed by changeset/155332582. I thought I fixed this waterway relation and used a grouping to convert the areas to lines for a multipolygon relation, but I missed the duplicate relation that was created as I did this. Thanks! |
|
| 155160417 | I fixed Two Lakes in changeset/155332198. I fixed Twin Lakes in changeset/155332350. |
|
| 155160417 | Thanks for helping me correct this. I realized yesterday after working on the other changeset you commented on for Beaverhead River that I did this incorrectly. I believe this is now fixed correctly with changeset/155331798. |
|
| 154543248 | I believe I got this fixed. Can you double check this? Thanks!
|
|
| 154152926 | I added these in and wasn't sure it was the correct way to do it. But there are a couple attached multi-use paths that are signed, but are often blocked by garbage bins and parked cars. I thought it would be helpful to mark these separately since they are two-way multi-use paths. |
|
| 154239099 | I wasn't aware of that naming convention. I can change these. The numbers are part of the trail name, and on many published maps these are referred to be number only. Do you still think it should be moved to ref? |