jordol's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 177788533 | Hi,
Could be wrong of course, happy to be corrected if there is any info that says it's only for a short time. |
|
| 159932593 | Apologies, definitely didn't intend to. Added back in changeset/159969313 |
|
| 120436494 | OK no worries I've adjusted them to be separate. Noted you changed one so left that one alone. |
|
| 89155398 | Hey Mate, I think you've accidentally tagged relation/4246124 ("Greater Melbourne" polygon) as a parking lot. I've changed it back to be a region in changeset/89342443 if you want to double check my edit. Thanks.
|
|
| 68719203 | Thanks for that, will remember it for next time. |
|
| 68719203 | Hi Aleksandar, Thanks for reviewing the change. It's sign posted as a roundabout and operates like a roundabout so yes it still appears correct to me. But it is a little unusual as you can see from the imagery. If there is a better way I should have tagged the change? Please let me know I'd like to improve my recording of changes. Jordan. |
|
| 73428503 | I think that's probably the root cause. I'm looking at it here without the rendered label on what must be the default level for this change. You can't miss the polygon lablel when it's drawn at other layers. Nice analysis, cheers. |
|
| 73428503 | Hi Jonorossi, Thanks for the feedback, it was my mistake sorry I didn't notice the boundary of the facility hiding under some other things. I've removed the node now - will keep more of an eye out next time. |
|
| 67601979 | That was my understanding that these national parks / marine parks / etc should have this tag when they are solely in the water. My interest was in the Australia coastal area so it was easy enough to flag them all manually. |