I reverted this changeset because it duplicated an already-mapped substation.

I broke a bus route relation by deleting a road that no longer exists. Please fix the bus route if you know the new route.

Please do not add a bridge if you cannot confirm there is a bridge. There is no bridge at this location so I have removed it in changeset/177322046.

Ah ok. Good find.

Occasionally I use https://nominatim.org/qa/ to find address errors (like the one I had fixed here) but unfortunately duplicates are not something that gets flagged.

I didn't determine the addresses, I just corrected the street part. These were added in CS#173864809.

Given the pattern, the building to the east is likely incorrectly numbered.

I am interested, what tool are you using to find duplicates?

Thanks,
Joel

Mapping temporary road closures on OSM is difficult. If you believe there is a better way of mapping this, please go ahead and make the change.

Closer to Jan 26th, it will probably be best to change this to oneway=yes so that all routers reflect this significant road closure. I do not believe most routers will consider the temporary oneway tagging I added in their calculation.

Wow, thank you for the huge effort both fixing the addresses and splitting the buildings into semi-detached ones. I was expecting just a split of the addresses into two nodes but you went above and beyond by separating each side of each duplex. I just want to emphasize how much I appreciate this!

I have reverted this changeset due to the large number of errors.

changeset/176800211

Hi meisoof,

These are bus LANES and should not be mapped separately unless there is a physical barrier between them and the rest of the road. You continue create separate roadways where they do not exist. Please review the OSM wiki osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway and turn=*

Thank you,
Joel

Fixed, thanks.

I have gone through this same process of realization.

I have been observing your mapping work and I want to say thanks for your contributions!

Hi, I have remove the extended turn lane. Unless they are physically separated, turn lanes should not be added as separate "ways". Thanks, Joel

Hi, You have mapped separate roads when I think you intended to map separate lanes. Can you confirm? In OSM we do not map separate lanes with individual 'ways'. Thanks, Joel

Regarding relation/18636349, I don't see any signage indicating a turn restriction here. Is this something you surveyed? Maybe imagery is out of date.

Hi Josh, this is a duplicate entry for this amenity.

For whatever reason, Organic Maps doesn't use all the tags. I have updated the existing amenity with the additional alternative name of "HI Vancouver Downtown" to hopefully help with how Organic Maps uses the data.

Thanks,
Joel

Awesome, thanks.

I think you added this at the wrong location? The address you added is on Main Street.

I would also tag it as highway=service.

I added a bus_bay=right tag to indicate the bus bay.

Thanks,
Joel

Hi Luya,
This was a duplicate so I combined it with the existing amenity.
Thanks,
Joel

Hi meisoof,

Imperial Street does not have separate roadways and cycleways as you have added here. Roadways and turn lanes should not be drawn separated if not separated by a physical barrier. Please see the OSM wiki: osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway

This is the third time I have tried to start a discussion about this same issue. Please see my previous comments on changeset/150559739 and changeset/156787504. Going forward, I plan to revert any of your changesets that continue to make this error unless you can explain why you continue to ignore our community standards.

Quickly going through your recent edits and I see several other instances of this same issue: changeset/167843529, changeset/161391898, changeset/167425761, changeset/168815152.

Thank you,
Joel