OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
158761656 about 1 year ago

We use the cuisine tag to indicate that food is served, & what kind. This is often used for restaurants but can also be applied to shops that prepare food. I used cuisine=breakfast;sandwich (multiple values separated by a semicolon) for this shop.

I also removed the fixme tag -- in general this isn't the best way to communicate with your fellow mappers. You can ask questions at community forums (https://community.openstreetmap.org) and there's also an active community on Slack that includes a NYC-specific channel #local-nyc (https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C4DPLAN3U).

OSM also has some built-in discussion methods: direct messages to other mappers, changeset comments (like this), and map notes which allow public discussion about issues at a particular location.

158761656 about 1 year ago

Hi alpine_alpaca & welcome to OSM in NYC, great to see a new mapper on the scene!

I was updating the Stuyvesant Gourmet Deli (node/3676993335) when I noticed the fixme tag that you added in this changeset, asking if shop=convenience is the correct tag for a bodega... and generally, yeah, I'd say it is. You might find some tagged in other ways -- maybe shop=deli or shop=greengrocer -- and those might be ok in specific circumstances. But shop=convenience is usually the best tag for a small shop that sells food & isn't any kind of specialty shop.

100108383 about 1 year ago

Howdy, just noticed this changeset from a few years back. The modifications to the four address nodes (2868660099, 2868661029, 2868661030, and 2868661036) are incorrect. Eg 2868661036, which had addr:housenumber=154-05, was changed to addr:housenumber=154 and addr:unit=5 was added.

Hyphenated housenumber fields like 154-05 are a notorious feature of the addressing system in Queens. The entire string, including the dash char, is the correct housenumber. You can read more at https://nycplanning.github.io/Geosupport-UPG/chapters/chapterV/section02/ (search for "hyphenated house number".) So next time you're mapping in Queens be aware of this practice.

Don't worry about fixing anything though -- it turns out this building only has a single address, so I added that to the building way and deleted the address nodes.

Happy mapping, J

156917953 about 1 year ago

Thanks Mateusz -- I wasn't aware of those tags & iirc made this one up on the spot. I've retagged node/8446152255 as shop=esoteric. (My impression is that the term "new age" is a little out of fashion. I'm most accustomed to hearing it as a sarcastic pejorative, and haven't encountered any self-identified new agers in many years.)

156461035 about 1 year ago

PS ... actually node/2550057146 already changed to a craft shop, no longer disused

156461035 about 1 year ago

Howdy jhaluska80 -- I've just reverted this changeset in 156595039

A couple of things...
- Re "Think Ice Cream" that you deleted: When a business has closed, consider just removing its tags from the OSM feature (node/2550057146 in this case) rather than deleting the feature altogether. This allows us to maintain the history of locations. See osm.wiki/Keep_the_history ... and sometimes it might help to prepend a "disused:" prefix to the poi's primary tag (eg amenity=ice_cream -> disused:amenity=ice_cream) if the feature is still physically there but no longer doing business, see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

- Re the building footprints that you adjusted: In an area with mature(ish) mapping, remember that there's no guarantee that iD's default aerial imagery is better aligned than the existing mapped features. If you do feel there's sufficient reason to tweak buildings' alignment, please take care when the ones you're moving are attached to other buildings (very common in city blocks.) Otherwise the adjacent buildings will be distorted ( see the skewed footprints at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156461035 )

Thanks & happy mapping!

151198572 over 1 year ago

Just did some updates to the Drawing Center (way/249664327) and noticed you'd added wheelchair=no... they do have steps but there's also a sidewalk-level entrance, and the website (https://drawingcenter.org/visit) claims they have "accessible galleries, bookstore, and restroom facilities"

153819213 over 1 year ago

Hi, thanks for adding the opening hours of the Drawing Center.

I was changing the hours into the standard format that we in OSM (documented at opening%20hours=* but the short version is that we use 24 hour time and two-letter day abbreviations) and I noticed a discrepancy between the hours you added and those listed on the Drawing Center's website.The website says they're open Thursdays but you wrote "Thursday Closed."

I used the info from the website, but is the website wrong?

146562800 over 1 year ago

I clearly remember seeing a "no motorcycles" rule in place at one time, but I haven't been able to find it since. Was this signed at the cemetery?

141401927 over 1 year ago

Thanks for adding this path: way/1208651473

I just used it and saved a few minutes :)

152588296 over 1 year ago

(I also reopened the zoo!)

152603444 over 1 year ago

(changeset comment should have said "add address")

149875715 over 1 year ago

Howdy! On some intersection nodes eg node/11455767273 you've added crossing=traffic_signals but I'm not sure that's correct. This tag shouldn't be used unless there's a walk signal for pedestrians. As far as I know this intersection just has stop signs, not signals.

149420271 over 1 year ago

Hi isakavya -- the tag "access:conditional=no @(Mo-Fr 07:00-13:00) 07:00-13:00)" on the segment way/1268090833 that you created is badly formatted (mismatched parens).

Your changset comment "added restriction for board is only for buses" doesn't exactly make sense either -- are you trying to say that this entire block of Lexington is bus only for those hours? Perhaps you noticed a restriction sign for the bus lane and thought it applied to the entire roadway?

149223746 over 1 year ago

Thanks!

149395903 over 1 year ago

Nah they didn't have one posted at all, good catch, fixed

148569753 over 1 year ago

Great, let me know if you need any help, or eyes on the ground. Happy mapping!

148569753 over 1 year ago

Hi kguenther24!

I see you've been adding a lot of highway=pedestrian + area=yes polygons (& multipolygons) in downtown Brooklyn. Unfortunately the mapping methods you're using are causing errors in pedestrian routing. Examples:

- From Columbia Heights down to Squibb Park (osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=40.70077%2C-73.99523%3B40.70088%2C-73.99548#map=19/40.70089/-73.99528):
The route now follows the edge of way/1257037956 instead of taking the long ramp down into the park.

- From Sands Street to the Manhattan Bridge walkway (osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=40.69988%2C-73.98712%3B40.70005%2C-73.98682): The route now follows way/1262001717 (added in this changeset) and jumps from ground level directly up to the bridge. This bypasses the stairs, which is especially bad because it impacts wheelchair and bicycle routing. (Bicycles aren't actually allowed here at the moment, of course.)

Current screenshots are at https://jmapb.github.io/kguenther24/ in case the map changes before you read this.

The underlying issue seems to be that you're using highway=pedestrian + area=yes tags to describe the shape of sidewalks and other linear footways. This is incorrect tagging because area=yes should only be used on a highway area if it can be navigated omnidirectionally -- that is, when a traveler can meaningfully move in any direction and enter and exit the area at any point where it connects to other highways.

For linear (one way or two way) highways, you can use area:highway=* tags to map the area details. See area:highway=footway for sidewalks and other footways, area:highway=steps for stairs, and area:highway=pedestrian for linear pedestrian highways. These tags will allow the routing engines to process the highways as linear, which should keep these errors from happening.

Thanks, jmapb

149223746 over 1 year ago

Hi there! Looks like you disconnected the cycleway segment way/1062089087 from the crosswalks at node/6815003765 and node/11766086963. Was this intentional?

Thanks, J

147629506 almost 2 years ago

Hi George, I came to finally scout this 4-year-old note note/2222572 but you beat me to the punch, congrats!

I noticed you left this small segment of Milla Drive: way/20237460 -- was that intentional? I didn't see anything that would indicate that there's any road name around here other than Sun Mountain Road.