It's also better to change the existing node too to preserve it's history rather than deleting and re-creating

Then change the business to an address if it changes or is empty, Otherwise things are double tagged, and you do not have the full address. Just putting a unit address with no other details throws constant QA errors and is unacceptable to do like that on here.

The issue is that you had 3 nodes in North America, and one in SE Asia

Those areas outside are part of other cities and towns but all share a zipcode as Colorado zip codes span municipalities. The OSM wiki itself calls out that Parker is a town and notes it. OSM also tends to treat 100k as the dividing line

Parker is not a city, officially it is a town

Correct those roads/driveways are all public now. I believe they were marked private when construction of the neighborhood was on going but was never cleaned up afterward. I can clean it up right now no problem.

This is a public park and public parking. Please revert this edit

This is a public park and parking area. Please revert

Correct, that CO one is a Denver Biscuit Company. Steak N Shake was there a long time ago.

Do you have a source for this park? It looks like just a drainage pond.

Please also use a more descriptive change set comment

Hello, this construction wrapped up last month and is completed. Also when doing this, there is a "construction area" that you can use to tag instead of having your boundary appear as a road.

Renamed C-470 Trail Route to be 470 Trail as it uses elements of the E-470 Trail

All across the map service roads are placed into these drainage basins as they are for service access and have improvements over say a dirt track which is what track is supposed to be used for out in forests or other rural areas with no improvement. Data like this is critical for other entities that use the map data say for emergency access or just internal use. Just cause something isn't frequently used doesn't mean it shouldn't exist on here. Giving other groups the best available data is critical and dirt tracks are about the lowest category of a way. I use many sources of imagery which are newer than bings data and my apologies but none showed that change. Even many of the schools active maps depict it being one way. If you see errors in edits the community expects you to comments and let the user have a chance to fix that error themselves unless it shows in QA as a critical error

If you have concerns of recent edits please comment on them not just "fix" things to incorrect/inconsistent with standards across the map. Thank you.

These are service roads by definition for vehicle access, not paths. Please do not change.

Please don't create items that are not real. This "trail" is not a trail, and it's on private property and locked gates

I reverted your change back but also fixed the routing error you caused that prompted my change as you did not adjust the lanes, nor turn the restrictions on the lanes which threw that error

This is done this way for nav/routing systems to alert people to the junction and to make the lane change. This is how it is done all across the map so it it being consistent with everywhere else. It may look messy but it does a function. I live right here and driver this daily.

That is indeed true however on here we do not treat these as road names. You in this case have to use a main entrance tag with a name