Beautiful work on the basins.

131 is probably have trouble with trucks getting stuck in front of their home, so they bought a private sign and put it up to try to solve the problem. There is no public turn around there and backing up is challenging.

I would recommend just changing the access to hgv=no for that section and leaving it public to people walking/biking/cars.

I would just make sure the driveway is mapped as access=private and also put access:delivery=no on the driveway.

That should make everybody happy.

It's a public road according to the parcel map.

Just cause an owner claims it is private doesn't make it true. It just means he put a private sign up on public land.

Go check the parcel map and contact the city.

Hi. I'm a rare mapper who works on speed limits. Often the speed limits get out of date or mapped incorrectly cause they're extremely tedious to do correctly, missing a single sign (or a sign getting knocked down) causes a lot of headaches. And our street side information can become out of date.

I'm not native to the area so I have to use older street side imagery or mapillary. I noticed near the bridge over Meramec River you changed a speed limit down from 60 mph to 55 mph, but the older imagery has a 60 mph going West right after the bridge.

Which is valid?

That's some quality building outlines. Always nice to see it.

A lot of your buildings aren't square. hit the Q key when done and they'll look better.

Thanks for noticing. I try to map to the best of my abilities. Hopefully it makes for a map people feel confident using and feel good contributing to.

I reverted this change. The correct course of action to is to change it to a path, and update the access tag to private which I did. I also added the fences and gates.

OSM maps private roads all the time, if we just delete them people may readd them incorrectly.

Some of the highest quality building work I've seen. Great job.

I removed the park and conflated the address into the building for you.

I stumbled upon your note. Since you requested a review. Here you go.

1. This is not a private park. This is considered mapping for the renderer and is considered vandalism. It needs to be removed.

Addresses are typically put on the main building that people should be navigated to for that address.

2. There is no name for most grass / woods and most parking lots. Just leave it blank.

3. Most of it is grass. Draw out the smaller sections and map it as grass.

4. Draw out the parking lot if you wish.

5. Individual trees can be put down over the grass.

6. Nearby there is woods. My rule of thumb for woods or grass is if they maintain (mow) under it.

7. You can throw down some foot paths over the grass.

If you do all of those it'll look nice. Hope that helps.

Great job on the building outlines.

If you switch the background to Mapbox Satellite you can see there is a nearby building visible to the West or is the address associated with the driveway a little North?

Only asking cause most routing algorithms will route to Ironwood place and not Birch lane with the current placement.

I was planning to unsplit this way in the next few hours. I may need you to double check the turn restrictions afterwards.

I have been fixing a lot of routing issues in NJ, I see you also are interested in it as well.

In my experience that's not that the best way to fix it as it doesn't give the routers the correct information.

It's best to add access=customers (access=private for non stores/private residences, and access=destination for non through public roads) to prevent using sections of roads as a short cut (and assuming it's actually true). It'll still use them for end point routing.

I put them a lot on the gas stations / stores on corners.

I know this is old and maybe you already learned it, but just in case.

I have updated it to customers for you.

Did they physically add a median? The aerials makes it look incorrectly split.

The Q key will auto square building corners for you. It'll help you make nicer looking buildings.

Why was the Challenger path marked one way? I haven't seen that before.

Based off https://property.nola.gov/

You tagged Desire near Florida Ave as private. The parcel map indicates Desire St looks like it's on public property. Just because it's fenced off doesn't mean it's private.

The parcel map also indicates that section is called Desire Street (not Parkway). If there isn't a street sign, it's likely the real name, and name:signed=no tag should be added.

If there is a chance of being readded, don't delete it and instead add the life cycle prefix.

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

For instance this may have been better tagged with the abandoned prefix.

This will keep it from being rendered/used, but it also keeps people from accidentally readding it from old maps / aerials.

This gets all new mappers as the ID editor does not make it obvious.