the church isn't the only tenant of this building, so i wouldn't tag the whole thing based on the church. also landuse doesn't go on buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183319534

sorry, landuse doesn't go on buildings either. the whole property
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183319490

thanks for fixing so many of these building shapes!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183276017

landuse doesn't belong on POI nodes. also, this is a case where the OSM tag and US english don't perfectly align. i would actually tag this as education=kindergarten and drop the amenity tag
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183314892

landuse tag doesn't belong on a POI. you could tag the church property area, though
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183315944

the landuse tag doesn't belong on a POI
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183316643

these footprints got a little messed up, looks like. could you revisit these and straighten up the corners?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182850108

some of these look like towers, definitely a step up form poles. maybe with "design=h-frame" added?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182485524

it's fine to convert the node to an area, but you deleted all the address tags and did not move them to the area
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182394302

some of these building shapes aren't even close. i know this was a while ago, but i hope your building mapping has gotten a little more careful since then

Looks great! Thanks for adding these details!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181697179

Oh, well hello there, stranger!

Just a heads up: street names in OSM get spelled out in full, like "South Adams Street".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181684184

it probably looks like an import, but no! i digitized all of these by hand! just waited to conflate and upload in one go

those were real addresses assigned by the county. why delete them?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177071528

this is the high point of the county, but i don't think it's actually named as such; is it named on a map you were referencing? i would not call it a peak, either, it's just a spot that's a little higher than what's around it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178012602

thanks for adding so many points of interest to the map! great level of detail!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178106168

do these power lines actually have real names? where is this information coming from?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177629038

hi there! while i do not disagree with your change, please note that "unclassified" has a very distinct meaning in OSM highway tagging, it is not an "unidentified" road type.

well, you've got your work cut out for you. the naperville area is full of "amateur" instersections like this.

Hi there! having the traffic signal points at the stop line for each road is a valid, and more detailed, way of mapping an intersection. what's the reason for collapsing them into a single node?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170994181