jcarlson's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 188385148 | the portion of the pedestrian path in the street could be tagged as `footway=crossing`, to differentiate from actual sidewalks
|
|
| 188989617 | opinions on sidewalk mapping can vary a LOT, but when the sidewalk already exists as its own feature in OSM, it is extra helpful to tag the road with `sidewalk:both=separate`. i'm not sure if that's something you can even do in StreetComplete, though.
|
|
| 188989856 | thanks for adding so many high-quality edits! the area is looking really good
|
|
| 185501625 | these are operated by the school, not the city. operator for sidewalks will typically follow the road, but if the footpath is off on private property, not along the right-of-way, it will probably be something else
|
|
| 185705733 | Thanks for catching all of these. I've followed up with the intern doing this work to use the proper tag moving forward.
|
|
| 184063415 | what are the tags on node/13936369283? node/13936369183 are they just GPS metadata?
|
|
| 184439164 | you probably just "bumped" a preset in iD, but you dropped a bunch of valid tags off of the bakery POI and turned it into a "compass_rose" feature? I put it all back.
|
|
| 185078354 | thanks for adding power features to the map! the poles along the line are usually tagged "power=pole", by the way.
|
|
| 183319534 | the church isn't the only tenant of this building, so i wouldn't tag the whole thing based on the church. also landuse doesn't go on buildings
|
|
| 183319490 | sorry, landuse doesn't go on buildings either. the whole property
|
|
| 183276017 | thanks for fixing so many of these building shapes!
|
|
| 183314892 | landuse doesn't belong on POI nodes. also, this is a case where the OSM tag and US english don't perfectly align. i would actually tag this as education=kindergarten and drop the amenity tag
|
|
| 183315944 | landuse tag doesn't belong on a POI. you could tag the church property area, though
|
|
| 183316643 | the landuse tag doesn't belong on a POI
|
|
| 182850108 | these footprints got a little messed up, looks like. could you revisit these and straighten up the corners?
|
|
| 182485524 | some of these look like towers, definitely a step up form poles. maybe with "design=h-frame" added?
|
|
| 182394302 | it's fine to convert the node to an area, but you deleted all the address tags and did not move them to the area
|
|
| 161654990 | some of these building shapes aren't even close. i know this was a while ago, but i hope your building mapping has gotten a little more careful since then |
|
| 181697179 | Looks great! Thanks for adding these details!
|
|
| 181684184 | Oh, well hello there, stranger! Just a heads up: street names in OSM get spelled out in full, like "South Adams Street".
|