Correction: Sourced used was Mapillary too.

Source: Mapillary

The source for this change is seen in Mapillary.

Thanks for the reminder. I referenced SDFE Skråfoto for this changeset, because I used the different angles to be able to see the road to build it in OSM, but I will additionally use the standard aerial imagery in the future.

Hey DeKaN,
The way in question was not initially added by me but because I extended way/1011823074 and way/201863709, my history ended up on way/1011823073. Would you like me to remove that service road? Aerial imagery is heavily vegetated here and Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4308048789232312) shows a lot of snow but it does appear that this is not in fact a road. Do you know if there is a walkway here? Perhaps highway=footway would be a better option.

Thank you for reaching out,

My intent was not to vandalize data. In the process of adding a missing road I unintentionally reclassified the secondary to service. Thank you for changing it back.

Thank you,
jbraggs

I removed unclassified tags from Montazhnikov Lane because the service road is different from the unclassified street and shouldn't continue from that road.

Removed unclassified tags from Montazhnikov Lane road #adt

Source used was OSM Data

Correction;Reclassified Rua AR 20, Rua AR 21, Rua AR 22, Rua AR 23, Avenida Raimundo Lima, Rua AR24, Estrada Sentido Trinidade Go, Rua Eduardo Moraes Bufaiçal to tertiary.
Source Maxar Premium Imagery.