OpenStreetMap
jayaddison's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 184612598 | Ok; yes, I noticed that and wasn't sure what it was (and omitted it). In future I'll map similar artifacts as buildings. Thank you, Frans. |
|
| 184611424 | (this changeset is a revert of changeset/184609727) |
|
| 184609727 | Reverted by changeset/184611424 |
|
| 184609727 | I plan to revert this; on closer inspection, these are not buildings; this changeset was within an area named as a cemetary. |
|
| 184333140 | Thank you! |
|
| 183886673 | Generally looks great! By chance I might have noticed a conflation error - manually-added street lamp node/8796294130 seems to be in-between two of the imported ones. I'll try to double-check / resurvey there (Calton Hill) to confirm that. |
|
| 184105278 | Thanks! |
|
| 183192734 | What do you think about tagging the windmill and lighthouse with building=miniature to indicate that they are replicas? I'm asking after noticing a discussion thread about the lighthouse on the osm.town Mastodon instance: https://osm.town/@MagicPocketbook462/116714147690144363 |
|
| 183291950 | From the description in a BBC News article about it, it looks and sounds similar to Argentinierstrasse in Vienna, Austria (way/1299141461), in terms of road user priority. That street is tagged with highway=residential -- although in a way, I find that the OSM wiki description of highway=cyclestreet seems accurate for both (roadways with signage to indicate priority of bicyclists, however still allowing cars). Refs:
|
|
| 183655921 | Thanks for mapping these! I haven't mapped many charging stations, and mostly cases where the parking spaces are all adjacent. Using a relation seems sensible here (and follows the wiki guidance) because there are two non-adjacent pairs of the charging stations. One thing I noticed: I'm not sure whether the tagging of the power sockets fits with standard tagging. I'll try to read more about that soon to check. |
|
| 183228867 | Thank you, @RAytoun |
|
| 183269864 | Thank you for your feedback - I'll watch those videos soon and update my mapping approach! |
|
| 183201792 | Thank you for adding the hotel to OpenStreetMap! Doing this will allow the hotel to appear in various apps and amenity searches. However: please choose to display the hotel as _either_ node/13882574456 OR way/604661067 - but not both. This is to follow the "one feature, one OSM element" good practice: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element |
|
| 183115448 | The imagery on Bing show what appear to be a cross-hatched roof/covering across both that building and the one adjacent to it. In Mapbox, the building does not appear, but some smaller buildings are evident. I felt that the large roof structure may have been a temporary covering of some sort during work/construction, and so I mapped from Mapbox instead. However: comparing to Esri imagery, it does appear that a large building exists there, not the smaller ones. Thank you for correcting this. |
|
| 182440437 | Thanks for adding data to OpenStreetMap! However: O'Neill's is already on the map as node/839139665. Please prefer to update details on existing objects when possible, unless it is missing from the map. Thanks again. |
|
| 182600417 | Thanks for adding this description - does it refer to a water tap in Bridge End harbour (node/13824244501)? For some reason this point is in the middle of the Sound! |
|
| 183045117 | Local .osm changeset uploaded; I've retracted all these buildings (the way IDs listed above) from Esri: changeset/183079918 |
|
| 183045117 | I've prepared a local .osm changeset file using JOSM that retraces these buildings from Esri imagery, and replaces the existing ones with misleading tagging. I'll check with the HotOSM project team whether this is OK to upload, and when. |
|
| 183055585 | Confirmed, thanks (I also passed by recently to check -- but hadn't gotten around to removing them) |
|
| 183045117 | Strictly speaking I did copy these from objects that originated from the given 'source:*'. Does that mean that, in fact, we should retain the source information on them? The list of object IDs is: w:1518988409
|