jarno_o's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 150538636 | Second of three changesets which revise the Bakkerspolder. First is 150538390 (which I uploaded from my main), third is 150538784. It should be obvious the sources used are in the changeset's comment, not in its source tag. That was user error with copy-pasting from a previous changeset which used the same sources. |
|
| 150538390 | (it should be obvious the actual sources used are in the changeset comment, not the source tag - that was an error on my part with copy-pasting from an earlier changeset where I used the same sources) |
|
| 150538784 | Third changeset which revises the Bakkerspolder. The first is 150538390 (which I uploaded from my main), the second 150538636. |
|
| 150538390 | First of the revision of the Bakkerspolder, the others are 150538636 and 150538784. I accidentally used my main account to upload this one - thanks OAuth 2. |
|
| 145779418 | Second of a two-part changeset (which I inadvertently gave a different summary due to a resolved merge conflict). The first is 145779415. |
|
| 145779415 | First of a two-part changeset. The other is 145779418. |
|
| 131708543 | Two-parter; the other one is 131708422. |
|
| 131708422 | Two-parter; the other one is 131708543. |
|
| 125921594 | Looks like the sources got messed up while I was fixing a conflict. It should've been "AIV Digitaal Hoogtemodel Vlaanderen II, Skyview factor 0,25 m; AIV Flanders GRB; AIV Flanders 2013-2015 aerial imagery 10cm; AIV Flanders 2017 through preliminary aerial imagery; CRAB; Verkeersborden Vlaanderen; Geopunt" |
|
| 125129052 | Two-parter; the other one is 125129051. |
|
| 125129051 | Two-parter; the other one is 125129052 |
|
| 124544275 | Two-parter, the other one is 124544276. |
|
| 124544276 | Two-parter, the other one is 124544275. |
|
| 121940053 | Do know this is a proxy for anonymous edits made to the map using Wheelmap's editor. Their profile page contains contact information; I suggest using that way first. There's a high probability that, due to the nature of this 'user' (read: proxy), all comments on their changesets remain unread. Besides, I reckon the way they do things has been sorted with OSM staff, otherwise this account would already have gotten plenty of blocks given the account's 28k+ edits. That's not to say these large-area changesets are ideal, far from. |